• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

80's Ranger 4x4 for the Trails


PetroleumJunkie412

Official TRS EV Taunter
Supporting Member
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
7,826
Reaction score
6,565
Points
113
Location
Dirtman's Basement
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Size
2.9l Trinity
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Give 'yer balls a tug. Fight me.
The upper blocks are factory. Lowers are not.
 


85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,380
Reaction score
17,953
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
Is this suspension lift height equal to those two blocks? Or is it added to something else too? Just talking about suspension lift not body lift.
If I take a block out (assuming just one block is safe) how would I lower the front to match it?
Get new u-bolts (factory replacement ones) and ditch the bottom blocks.

Then do this:


And you will end up about where you started for ride height.

Depending how "into it" you want to go there are other options like different rear springs and whatnot but more $$ and complexity

 

ericbphoto

Overlander in development
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
15,387
Reaction score
16,718
Points
113
Age
59
Location
Wellford, SC
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6"
Tire Size
35"
My credo
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different.
It would probably be easier and cheaper to replace the rear blocks with proper springs and/or different shackles.

Overall, your height looks good. I know its just personal preference. But I would keep the lift. Just make the rear safer.
 

eightynine4x4

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
673
Reaction score
178
Points
43
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5" Suspension
Tire Size
31 x 10.5 x 15
Thanks guys,
So from what I understand, I am effectively replacing the u bolts with OEMs meant to fit with just having my “top” blocks, losing bottom ones. At that point my rear will be lower than the front by the amount the former bottom block was. To my eye it looks like less than 2”.
Then, I install those shackles to re-raise the rear. Is there adjustment to get it just right or do I select shackles of a certain size ..
As long as the front looks safe, I’ll keep it. I like the lift. I may bring the body lift down an inch but may also keep the 3”.
 

PetroleumJunkie412

Official TRS EV Taunter
Supporting Member
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
7,826
Reaction score
6,565
Points
113
Location
Dirtman's Basement
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Size
2.9l Trinity
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Give 'yer balls a tug. Fight me.
Body lift has advantages and disadvantages... generally speaking, I do not care for them.

Adjustable shackles can be had from advance auto, ebay, Amazon, etc. I run them on all of mine (all of my trucks are lifted in one way or another). They tend to be quite a bit beefier than the factory ones.

From experience, 1750lb rear springs and lift shackles will amount to 3-4 inches total lift in the rear with factory blocks.
 

MikeG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
752
Points
113
Location
central Texas
Vehicle Year
1997
Make / Model
B4000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
2"
Tire Size
235/75r15
If you want to run the rear height the same, on option is to get a SINGLE lift block (of whatever height you want). The factory one has the bumpstop, but non 4x4 trucks don't use that. The bumpstop for them just sticks down from the frame and (presumably) contacts the axle tube, before anything bad happens. If you can't find a lift block with the height you want and an integral bumpstop, then you likely can get away without running a bumpstop at all, if you don't routinely carry a ton in the back, or jump the truck off-road.

The advice to get NEW u-bolts (doesn't matter who they are from) is because the u-bolts can stretch, fatigue, etc. Not knowing any better I re-used the originals when I lifted my truck, but it's been so long and they've pretty well rusted beyond the point that they could vibrate loose, so I'm not gonna mess with them.
 

ericbphoto

Overlander in development
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
15,387
Reaction score
16,718
Points
113
Age
59
Location
Wellford, SC
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6"
Tire Size
35"
My credo
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different.
If you want to run the rear height the same, on option is to get a SINGLE lift block (of whatever height you want). The factory one has the bumpstop, but non 4x4 trucks don't use that. The bumpstop for them just sticks down from the frame and (presumably) contacts the axle tube, before anything bad happens. If you can't find a lift block with the height you want and an integral bumpstop, then you likely can get away without running a bumpstop at all, if you don't routinely carry a ton in the back, or jump the truck off-road.

The advice to get NEW u-bolts (doesn't matter who they are from) is because the u-bolts can stretch, fatigue, etc. Not knowing any better I re-used the originals when I lifted my truck, but it's been so long and they've pretty well rusted beyond the point that they could vibrate loose, so I'm not gonna mess with them.
That is an option. However, that single tall lift block adds a lot of leverage to the springs for axle wrap during hard acceleration and deceleration. It’s still not a great idea.
 

MikeG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
752
Points
113
Location
central Texas
Vehicle Year
1997
Make / Model
B4000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
2"
Tire Size
235/75r15
Agreed 100%.... but a single tall lift block is still safer than two stacked blocks. Anyway, you are correct and thanks for pointing that out.
 

PetroleumJunkie412

Official TRS EV Taunter
Supporting Member
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
7,826
Reaction score
6,565
Points
113
Location
Dirtman's Basement
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Size
2.9l Trinity
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Give 'yer balls a tug. Fight me.

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,380
Reaction score
17,953
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
If you want to run the rear height the same, on option is to get a SINGLE lift block (of whatever height you want). The factory one has the bumpstop, but non 4x4 trucks don't use that. The bumpstop for them just sticks down from the frame and (presumably) contacts the axle tube, before anything bad happens. If you can't find a lift block with the height you want and an integral bumpstop, then you likely can get away without running a bumpstop at all, if you don't routinely carry a ton in the back, or jump the truck off-road.

The advice to get NEW u-bolts (doesn't matter who they are from) is because the u-bolts can stretch, fatigue, etc. Not knowing any better I re-used the originals when I lifted my truck, but it's been so long and they've pretty well rusted beyond the point that they could vibrate loose, so I'm not gonna mess with them.
Non 4wd's use the axle for the bumpstop to catch, the big tab on the 4wd block just replicates that for the 4wd's.

If you don't have a real bumpstop your shocks become the bumpstops.
 

MikeG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
752
Points
113
Location
central Texas
Vehicle Year
1997
Make / Model
B4000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
2"
Tire Size
235/75r15
Non 4wd's use the axle for the bumpstop to catch, the big tab on the 4wd block just replicates that for the 4wd's.

If you don't have a real bumpstop your shocks become the bumpstops.
Never thought about that. Since the whole thing has been lifted, there's no telling, as I'd assume the shocks were replaced as well.

If he puts in a lower (single) lift block then it would be a rude surprise if the shocks bottomed out and blew apart, or ripped the mounts off the axle.....
 

ericbphoto

Overlander in development
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
15,387
Reaction score
16,718
Points
113
Age
59
Location
Wellford, SC
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6"
Tire Size
35"
My credo
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different.
Never thought about that. Since the whole thing has been lifted, there's no telling, as I'd assume the shocks were replaced as well.

If he puts in a lower (single) lift block then it would be a rude surprise if the shocks bottomed out and blew apart, or ripped the mounts off the axle.....
We are not recommending just pulling out the extra blocks. We are recommending removing the extra blocks and replacing shackles, etc. with different ones. That retains the current ride height with safer engineering and the shocks are unaffected.
 

MikeG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
752
Points
113
Location
central Texas
Vehicle Year
1997
Make / Model
B4000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
2"
Tire Size
235/75r15

eightynine4x4

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
673
Reaction score
178
Points
43
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5" Suspension
Tire Size
31 x 10.5 x 15
Alrighty I’ll remove the lower blocks to keep just the OEMs, put in new OEM Ubolts, and add the shackles linked in the article. It says they’re about 2” lift, so that should be pretty close to what I have now.

As for that steering stabalizing cross shock thing in front.. can I really just remove it? Someone didn’t have some good reason to install it?

one random thing I didn’t mention before was that the front left shock is literally dangling unattached at its bottom. So there’s that.

lastly, I’d love to get as firm a feel as possible in this high stance. I know the amusement park ride feel comes with the territory, but the more stability I can gain the better. Perhaps firmer front shocks?
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Mudtruggy
May Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top