Dodahsand
New Member
1992 engine problems, cam. *UPDATE*.
I am a newbie with a 1992 2.3L ford ranger, 5 speed standard shift, A/C. It has been running great with 145,000 mile., until today!
The temperature this morning was about 54 degrees. I started my truck, sat there about 10 seconds, put it in reverse, let out the clutch, rolled in reverse about 5 feet and BUMP, it felt like I ran over a possum and at the same time the engine stopped. No sputtering or anything. Just stopped. Pushed in the clutch again and starter engaged and turned the engine but the engine would not fire. On and on...
I know there are a hundred things that could have happened and needs checked. But I think my cam broke. My timing belts is in tact and no visible fluid loss Oil or radiator fluid. Tomorrow i'll pick up a compression tester and start there.
But here is my question. If and only if I have damaged the engine and it would need to be replaced What would be a better engine than the 1992 2.3L??? It's never failed me for great gas mileage. Average has been 23 to 25 MPG and like other 2.3L low power. But I want more power without the loss of MPG> Thanks.
I am a newbie with a 1992 2.3L ford ranger, 5 speed standard shift, A/C. It has been running great with 145,000 mile., until today!
The temperature this morning was about 54 degrees. I started my truck, sat there about 10 seconds, put it in reverse, let out the clutch, rolled in reverse about 5 feet and BUMP, it felt like I ran over a possum and at the same time the engine stopped. No sputtering or anything. Just stopped. Pushed in the clutch again and starter engaged and turned the engine but the engine would not fire. On and on...
I know there are a hundred things that could have happened and needs checked. But I think my cam broke. My timing belts is in tact and no visible fluid loss Oil or radiator fluid. Tomorrow i'll pick up a compression tester and start there.
But here is my question. If and only if I have damaged the engine and it would need to be replaced What would be a better engine than the 1992 2.3L??? It's never failed me for great gas mileage. Average has been 23 to 25 MPG and like other 2.3L low power. But I want more power without the loss of MPG> Thanks.
Last edited: