• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

'96 2WD: 14"->15" upsize... anything wrong with this?


fireant

New Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Central TX
Vehicle Year
1996
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
Howdy folks.

i've got my hands on a gem of a Ranger.... 96 4.0 2WD auto with low miles.

The wheels on it are the stock 14x6 4-hole design, and I measured 3.75" backspacing on the one that had a blowout (the tires are shot!)



So this is a perfect opportunity to upgrade the wheels and tires. I'm looking at summit racing's deal on Cragar Soft 8's in 15x8 with 4" backspacing ( http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CRR-3975812/ ) , plus some 235x75/15 tires.



In a nutshell its this:

Wheels:
14x6 +3.75" ---> 15x8 +4"

Tires:
26.7" height ---> 28.9" height


Would there be any problems with this setup?
 
Last edited:


adsm08

Senior Master Grease Monkey
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
34,623
Reaction score
3,613
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
It'll work.
 

fireant

New Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Central TX
Vehicle Year
1996
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
Thanks. I'm assuming they will stick out a little more than stock, but not be a problem, correct?
 

adsm08

Senior Master Grease Monkey
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
34,623
Reaction score
3,613
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
As long as you get ones with a 4.5X5 bolt pattern they will be fine. Speedometer might be a hair off, nothing awful.
 

Rose2300

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
1,068
Reaction score
7
Points
0
Location
ID
Vehicle Year
1996
Make / Model
Toyota
Engine Size
3.4
Transmission
Automatic
Howdy folks.

i've got my hands on a gem of a Ranger.... 96 4.0 2WD auto with low miles.

The wheels on it are the stock 14x6 4-hole design, and I measured 3.75" backspacing on the one that had a blowout (the tires are shot!)
Would there be any problems with this setup?
there's your problem, rangers have a 5 hole design. the pic shows this too. i'm probably just trollin cuz i hope you made a typo :icon_thumby:
 

Thed

Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
631
Reaction score
19
Points
18
Location
Raleigh, NC
Vehicle Year
1996
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
They work.

 

fireant

New Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Central TX
Vehicle Year
1996
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
there's your problem, rangers have a 5 hole design. the pic shows this too. i'm probably just trollin cuz i hope you made a typo :icon_thumby:
By 4-hole, I really meant 4-spoke (the wheel design, not the bolt pattern).

Anyways, I went with 15x8 Soft-8s and 235/70/15s and they look great. Thanks for the help.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top