• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

2024 Ranger


Uncle Gump

Token Old Guy
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Messages
13,972
Reaction score
13,464
Points
113
Location
Ottawa IL
Vehicle Year
2006/1986
Make / Model
Ranger/BroncoII
Engine Size
4.0L SOHC/2.9L
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Lead follow or get out of my way


franklin2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2019
Messages
3,427
Reaction score
1,758
Points
113
Location
Virginia
Vehicle Year
1984
Make / Model
Bronco II
Transmission
Manual
Looks like a f150 to me. They get bigger and bigger. I think the Maverick is a check on Fords "little" Ranger turning into a full size truck. I think they will sell a lot of the Mavericks if they turn out to be reliable.
 
Last edited:

Blmpkn

Toilet enthusiast
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
5,503
Reaction score
6,359
Points
113
Location
Southern maine
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ford Bronco
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5"
Tire Size
285/75/18
My credo
Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.
They're already selling a ton of mavericks.

The new cab looks really similar to the old one. Not much of a redesign there it appears.
 

superj

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 1, 2021
Messages
3,116
Reaction score
2,578
Points
113
Location
corpus christi, texas
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
ranger edge
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3 liters of tire smoking power
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
none
Total Drop
none
Tire Size
235s
My credo
Grew up in the 70s, 80s, and 90s
To big. Midsized trucks need to be smaller. You need a ladder to get in the back of a ranger, just like you do on the f150
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,404
Reaction score
7,496
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
Front end looks better
 

Blmpkn

Toilet enthusiast
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
5,503
Reaction score
6,359
Points
113
Location
Southern maine
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ford Bronco
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5"
Tire Size
285/75/18
My credo
Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.
To big. Midsized trucks need to be smaller. You need a ladder to get in the back of a ranger, just like you do on the f150
It's really not all that much bigger than the old rangers. Definitely taller though.
 

superj

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 1, 2021
Messages
3,116
Reaction score
2,578
Points
113
Location
corpus christi, texas
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
ranger edge
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3 liters of tire smoking power
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
none
Total Drop
none
Tire Size
235s
My credo
Grew up in the 70s, 80s, and 90s
The ehight is what bother me. Thats what i mean by to big. I geuss i agould have said that instead.
 

franklin2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2019
Messages
3,427
Reaction score
1,758
Points
113
Location
Virginia
Vehicle Year
1984
Make / Model
Bronco II
Transmission
Manual
I used to have a old 1953 f100 that I got going and daily used for awhile before I sold it. My wife commented first thing on how easy it was to load the bed of that old truck, it was so much lower to the ground and had shorter bed sides than the newer f150 I had.
 

superj

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 1, 2021
Messages
3,116
Reaction score
2,578
Points
113
Location
corpus christi, texas
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
ranger edge
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3 liters of tire smoking power
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
none
Total Drop
none
Tire Size
235s
My credo
Grew up in the 70s, 80s, and 90s
Thats why i use my 04 ranger 90% of the time versus my 17 titan. I have to lower the tailgate to put stuff in the bed of the titan
 

wildbill23c

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ham Radio Operator
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
3,917
Reaction score
577
Points
113
Location
Southwestern Idaho
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
0
Total Drop
0
Tire Size
215/70-R14
My credo
19K, 19D, 92Y, 88M, 91F....OIF-III (2004-2005)
Looks like a f150 to me. They get bigger and bigger. I think the Maverick is a check on Fords "little" Ranger turning into a full size truck. I think they will sell a lot of the Mavericks if they turn out to be reliable.
Not sure how that's gonna go, just found specs on the engine in the Maverick, to include aluminum pistons...hmm, so now the whole engine just melts down into a blob of aluminum....so...all you metal guys out there that know the workings of metal far more than the majority of us...how do you think that will work out? Engines get hot of course, so you'd think that stuff would melt I guess not as it would have to be much hotter than an engine would get even if overheated?
 

wildbill23c

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ham Radio Operator
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
3,917
Reaction score
577
Points
113
Location
Southwestern Idaho
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
0
Total Drop
0
Tire Size
215/70-R14
My credo
19K, 19D, 92Y, 88M, 91F....OIF-III (2004-2005)
The ehight is what bother me. Thats what i mean by to big. I geuss i agould have said that instead.
That's my huge gripe of today's truck too. They sit way too high for comfortable loading/unloading from the bed. My 87 Ranger is great, relatively low to the ground to make loading and unloading heavy stuff very easy...and I don't need a ladder to reach stuff in the bed from the side rails of the bed...course I can't reach anything like that now as I have a camper shell on it, but normally its a great height for a work truck....apparently they left that part out of today's trucks given the ridiculously high bed heights they have, and that goes for all automakers, not just a Ford problem.
 

franklin2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2019
Messages
3,427
Reaction score
1,758
Points
113
Location
Virginia
Vehicle Year
1984
Make / Model
Bronco II
Transmission
Manual
Not sure how that's gonna go, just found specs on the engine in the Maverick, to include aluminum pistons...hmm, so now the whole engine just melts down into a blob of aluminum....so...all you metal guys out there that know the workings of metal far more than the majority of us...how do you think that will work out? Engines get hot of course, so you'd think that stuff would melt I guess not as it would have to be much hotter than an engine would get even if overheated?
??? Engines have used aluminum pistons since the 50's. Cast, forged, hypereutectic are all aluminum.
 

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,092
Reaction score
13,654
Points
113
Location
Jackson, NJ
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
Not sure how that's gonna go, just found specs on the engine in the Maverick, to include aluminum pistons...hmm, so now the whole engine just melts down into a blob of aluminum....so...all you metal guys out there that know the workings of metal far more than the majority of us...how do you think that will work out? Engines get hot of course, so you'd think that stuff would melt I guess not as it would have to be much hotter than an engine would get even if overheated?
D89AADD1-23E5-47EC-9C7A-CF9709EC5BC6.png
 

Uncle Gump

Token Old Guy
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Messages
13,972
Reaction score
13,464
Points
113
Location
Ottawa IL
Vehicle Year
2006/1986
Make / Model
Ranger/BroncoII
Engine Size
4.0L SOHC/2.9L
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Lead follow or get out of my way

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,342
Reaction score
17,838
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
Not sure how that's gonna go, just found specs on the engine in the Maverick, to include aluminum pistons...hmm, so now the whole engine just melts down into a blob of aluminum....so...all you metal guys out there that know the workings of metal far more than the majority of us...how do you think that will work out? Engines get hot of course, so you'd think that stuff would melt I guess not as it would have to be much hotter than an engine would get even if overheated?
Seems to be a new fad, I don't see it lasting very long. Long live the cast iron pistons!

 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top