MAKG
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2007
- Messages
- 4,634
- Reaction score
- 19
- Points
- 0
- Location
- California central coast
- Vehicle Year
- 1991
- Make / Model
- Ford
- Engine Size
- 4.0L
- Transmission
- Manual
Which is exactly what I was discussing. The upper intake -- while still very challenging -- is considerably simpler geometrically. The lower intake is either going to flow well on a flow bench or be driveable, if made by guessing.That would be a problem! Making a lower intake would SUCK. It could be done though.
And do you have any way to back up your claim that your sheetmetal intake outperforms ANY intake? I severely doubt it.
Putting three carbs (much less space than one or two) adapted to the lower intake can't make much improvement in space. The upper intake by itself isn't all that high, and now you have to squeeze in three throttle bodies with synchronization, plus a set of venturies plus float bowls plus fuel plumbing plus air filters.