Holy cow!!
Here is a website I found where Car Craft does a comparison of conventional vs synthetic.
Scuse me! What on earth did you think a magazine would say about products that are advertised in their book?
You gotta be kidding..you are, right?
Them guys make their living saying glossy things about car products... how long do you think they would stay in business if they told the WHOLE COMPLETE TRUTH?
If you read your post again it really doesn't say much anyway.. -62* and it flows.. so WHAT! How many of our vehicles will EVER see that temp and we NEED to go somewhere?
Really the only thing truthful that you repeated is that synthetic will withstand more heat.. But we don't need oil that will withstand more heat... As we don't HAVE more heat! Dino oil takes care of our heat just fine.
By the way.. There are no contaminants in modern oils. That paragraph is simply scare tactics.. Might have even been written by the synthetic company..
Big Jim
[QUOTE="Duke, post: 509710, member: 18764"]http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/synthetic_vs_conventional_oil/index.html
Here are some of Car Craft's findings during the comparison:
"Racers also know that most engine wear occurs at start-up, so it's critical that engine parts receive proper lubrication as soon as possible--hence the need for an initially thinner, so-called "winter" viscosity.
Because a synthetic oil's molecules are much more consistent in size and shape, they are better able to withstand extreme engine temperatures.
Because a synthetic oil is chemically produced, there are no contaminants in the oil. By contrast, conventional oils contain small amounts of sulfur, wax, and asphaltic material that can promote detonation as well as varnish and sludge buildup. With no wax, synthetics will flow at much lower temperatures than conventional oils.
An 0W-30 synthetic oil is capable of pumping easily at -62 degrees F and flowing at even lower temperatures. Conventional oils are essentially frozen solid at that temperature, so there's simply no conventional equivalent to this new grade.
In terms of peak numbers, we found that the engine gained nearly 7 hp with the thinner conventional oil, and was up nearly 10 hp with the synthetic. No peak torque gains were observed by changing from 20W-50 to 10W-30 conventional; however, the synthetic was up 15 lb-ft of torque at the peak.
However, thinner oil also translates to lower oil pressure: The 0W-30 oil developed 10 psi less than the baseline 20W-50. Only 46 psi was on tap at 6,200 rpm--kind of shaky as most gearheads like to see at least 10 psi per 1,000 rpm. Still, the engine ran OK, and the bearings looked fine on teardown, seemingly verifying synthetic manufacturers' claims that their products' greater shear strength more than makes up for lower viscosity."
You guys can buy whatever you want, but I am going to continue to buy synthetic oil of the recommended grade for all my vehicles.[/QUOTE]