MikeG
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2020
- Messages
- 1,353
- City
- central Texas
- Vehicle Year
- 1997
- Engine
- 4.0 V6
- Transmission
- Automatic
- Total Lift
- 2"
- Tire Size
- 235/75r15
Don't misunderstand me. Not looking for absolute "proof" one way or the other, trying to quantify it. Going uphill in snow is going to be a complex system with many variables..... WHICH variable is the most significant, and so on. And the answer to that is going to change based on the angle of the hill, vehicle mass, depth of snow, tire size, tread compound, air pressure, speed, weight distribution of the wheels, snow density, and maybe most important of all, the driver's right foot
Etc., etc.
There is not much "proving" anything with 10 or more variables. However they can be ranked, in certain situations.
I actually do see some scenarios where it could make a difference. But, my conclusion is - it would have to be right at the limit of traction in the available conditions to make the difference between success and failure. There are some conditions for which it won't be needed, and some for which it cannot help.
I mocked up one scenario just based on random variables (ie. hill angle) and found some interesting (to me) data where someone attempted to measure rolling resistance, etc. Probably someone's thesis.
Entirely different proposition than looking at a design defect..... "oops, maybe we shouldn't have put the gas tank where it can be hit."
I thought it was an interesting exercise, but not everyone likes to dig through the numbers.
Anyway 3 flakes of snow on the road, and you're taking your life into your hands where I live, because people either drive three miles an hour, or twice the posted limit.... sometimes in the same lane, at the same time. So I will probably not ever get an opportunity to test it.

There is not much "proving" anything with 10 or more variables. However they can be ranked, in certain situations.
I actually do see some scenarios where it could make a difference. But, my conclusion is - it would have to be right at the limit of traction in the available conditions to make the difference between success and failure. There are some conditions for which it won't be needed, and some for which it cannot help.
I mocked up one scenario just based on random variables (ie. hill angle) and found some interesting (to me) data where someone attempted to measure rolling resistance, etc. Probably someone's thesis.
Entirely different proposition than looking at a design defect..... "oops, maybe we shouldn't have put the gas tank where it can be hit."

I thought it was an interesting exercise, but not everyone likes to dig through the numbers.
Anyway 3 flakes of snow on the road, and you're taking your life into your hands where I live, because people either drive three miles an hour, or twice the posted limit.... sometimes in the same lane, at the same time. So I will probably not ever get an opportunity to test it.