• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Sulastic rubber shackles to improve harsh ride.


Redfire

New Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Vehicle Year
2006
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Automatic
Does anyone have any experience with the Sulastic rubber insulated shackle. It works as a torsion link between the frame mount and the rear leaf replacing the original shackle. Considering the light weight of the Ranger rear I am wondering if the benefit would be beneficial. Most reviews are for 3/4 ton or heavier trucks, although they make a shackle for the Ranger. $350 is a lot of change to spend without any data on ride quality improvement.
 


alwaysFlOoReD

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
13,955
Reaction score
5,100
Points
113
Location
Calgary, Canada
Vehicle Year
'91, '80, '06
Make / Model
Ford, GMC,Dodge
Engine Size
4.0,4.0,5.7
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
As far as I know the original shackle is already rubber insulated.

Richard
 

brinker88

11/2013 OTOM Winner
Supporting Member
OTOTM Winner
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
36
Points
0
Location
Williamsport, Pa
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
They are definitely rubber bushings. Same as what's in the spring eye.

Shackle part #

Dayton- 330-175

Automann- M1724
 

Redfire

New Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Vehicle Year
2006
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Automatic
I am fully aware of what comprises a stock suspension, rubber insulation between the bolt and shackle included. The Sulastic shackle is a device that has the two original mounting holes combined with a center link encased in rubber that acts like a torsion axle to dissipate the jarring effect of an empty truck. Please visit www.sulastic.com or search velvet ride shackle which I assume has become Sulastic. I am looking for real world experience with this device on small trucks. Thanks
 

brinker88

11/2013 OTOM Winner
Supporting Member
OTOTM Winner
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
36
Points
0
Location
Williamsport, Pa
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
So basically you have 2 pivot points now? And @ that price, it's astrenomically over price. Build a set yourself. It wouldnt be hard.

One question though, how does it "improve ride quality" ?
 

Redfire

New Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Vehicle Year
2006
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Automatic
I appreciate your input, but maybe a visit to the Sulastic website would get us both on the same page. I have no idea how you could duplicate them. I am hoping someone here has them on a Ranger.
 

brinker88

11/2013 OTOM Winner
Supporting Member
OTOTM Winner
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
36
Points
0
Location
Williamsport, Pa
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
The website has absolutely NO explanation on how it "works".

You would be better off going with a more well known company such as Roadmaster Active Suspension. They're the same price, offer better stability and a complete and well documented explanation of their product.

http://www.activesuspension.com/
 

Redfire

New Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Vehicle Year
2006
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Automatic
Funny, there are several videos (their web site and youtube), including tons of data from a Tacoma test including vibration, noise etc. Some testimonials too, just none for the Ranger. I want a softer unladen ride-not overloads. I guess I will stick to my three bags of traction sand until I find someone who understands my issue or has physical evidence if the Sulastics work. Thanks
 

fangotango306

Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
368
Reaction score
8
Points
18
Location
sc michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
None yet
Transmission
Automatic
softer ride=buy a car. you drive a truck it will ride like a truck.
 

alwaysFlOoReD

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
13,955
Reaction score
5,100
Points
113
Location
Calgary, Canada
Vehicle Year
'91, '80, '06
Make / Model
Ford, GMC,Dodge
Engine Size
4.0,4.0,5.7
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
I took a look, searched in the "tech documents", and can see how it would work. It seems to be a rework of "revolver shackles". Priced high IMO. I could make a set with out too much effort.

Richard
 

solraven

New Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
California
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford ranger
Transmission
Manual
I don't think they're like revolver shackles. It changes the angle of the pivot, a second rubber isolator, and adds what's almost a rubber bump stop so it can't rotate freely at the center pivot. I think this is what the referring to is the rubber shock absorber. I kind of wish I could find g-shackles for the earlier rangers but nobody seems to make them.
 

superj

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 1, 2021
Messages
3,117
Reaction score
2,578
Points
113
Location
corpus christi, texas
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
ranger edge
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3 liters of tire smoking power
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
none
Total Drop
none
Tire Size
235s
My credo
Grew up in the 70s, 80s, and 90s
what are g shackles?
 

lowspeedpursuit

Active Member
Joined
May 6, 2022
Messages
205
Reaction score
151
Points
43
Location
DE
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
B2300
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
At $350 in 2012 to $460 today, they're beating inflation, so how could you not buy them?

If these things' functional difference from revolver shackles is they can't flip, it looks like G-shackles are revolver shackles but with one arm shorter.

Back in Jeep-land, aside from the fact that revolver shackles will flip your YJ ass-over-teakettle when you drive downhill, another fun bit of conventional wisdom is that a spring's primary purpose is to set ride height and load capacity. If you're chasing comfort, for your money, start with the shocks.
 

ericbphoto

Overlander in development
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
15,338
Reaction score
16,598
Points
113
Age
59
Location
Wellford, SC
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6"
Tire Size
35"
My credo
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different.
another fun bit of conventional wisdom is that a spring's primary purpose is to set ride height and load capacity. If you're chasing comfort, for your money, start with the shocks.
I agree wholeheartedly with one minor addition. Truck suspensions are set to maintain ride height and handling with a certain payload. If you will never load the truck, you could, theoretically use softer springs and make up the ride height with blocks or different shackles. Then softer shocks could also be used and give a softer ride than what is attainable with the load capacity of the OEM springs.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top