• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

No Red line on tach


Mike92STX

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
196
Reaction score
59
Location
Zion,Illinois
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
245-75-16
I have a 2004 Ranger FX4, it has a manual trans. Can someone tell me why they didn't put a red line on the tach? The exhaust is so quiet I can't hear the motor good enough sometimes to tell when it's time to shift. It's not a real problem, just curious if anyone knows the reason. A guy I work with said that the tach only goes to 7000 rpm, so it doesn't need a red line.
 


rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
13,074
Reaction score
8,347
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
Redline is probably 5500rpm.

7k would probably grenade it.
 

lil_Blue_Ford

Cut & Weld
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
V8 Engine Swap
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,723
Reaction score
6,963
Location
Butler, PA, USSA
Vehicle Year
00
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0l
Transmission
Automatic
Total Drop
4”
I’m guessing they didn’t do a redline because different engines have different limits, but the computer for the engine has a governor built in 500 revs under redline
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
13,606
Reaction score
14,060
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
Standard shift RPM is just over 2,500 for everyday driving. Most modern engines have a rev limiter on them to keep people from blowing the engine up.

Other applications would have different shift points depending on if you looking for peak torque or peak horsepower. You'd have to look up the specs for your specific engine for those.
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,364
Reaction score
8,405
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
Not sure why they didn't, the 3 engines offered in 2004 have pretty much the same redline above 5,500

2.3l Duratec makes best torque at 3,750, best horsepower at 5,250
3.0l Vulcan makes best torque at 3,900, best HP at 5,200
4.0l SOHC has best torque at 3,000, best HP at 5,250

Best Torque decides when you shift if you want the fastest acceleration, so go 200rpm above best torque then shift to next gear, that should get next gear 200-300 below best torque RPM, so still in the power band of that engine

Generally speaking, in a 5-speed, gears 2, 3 and 4 will have a 500-600rpm difference
 

lil_Blue_Ford

Cut & Weld
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
V8 Engine Swap
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,723
Reaction score
6,963
Location
Butler, PA, USSA
Vehicle Year
00
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0l
Transmission
Automatic
Total Drop
4”
Standard shift RPM just over 2,500 for everyday driving. Most modern engines have a rev limiter on them to keep people from blowing the engine up.

Other applications would have different shift points depending on if you looking for peak torque or peak horsepower. You'd have to look up the specs for your specific engine for those.
See, the 3.0l is just starting to get wound up at 2,500, and they were good out to about 4,500, past that you started to fade out of the powerband and the computer would give you the finger at 5,500 and she’d buck and snort and tell you to shift. Redline was something like 6,000-6,500.

The 2.9 and 4.0 OHV were something like 6k, but the computer stops you at 5,500 anyway, but those motors are far out of their powerband by 5,500 since they make their power lower than the 3.0, so you would have benefited by not getting up to the limiter anyway.

I can’t really speak to the 4.0 SOHC or the 4-cylinders since I’ve not really owned any and never researched it.
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
13,606
Reaction score
14,060
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
See, the 3.0l is just starting to get wound up at 2,500, and they were good out to about 4,500, past that you started to fade out of the powerband and the computer would give you the finger at 5,500 and she’d buck and snort and tell you to shift. Redline was something like 6,000-6,500.

The 2.9 and 4.0 OHV were something like 6k, but the computer stops you at 5,500 anyway, but those motors are far out of their powerband by 5,500 since they make their power lower than the 3.0, so you would have benefited by not getting up to the limiter anyway.

I can’t really speak to the 4.0 SOHC or the 4-cylinders since I’ve not really owned any and never researched it.
I want to say the SOHC red lines somewhere around 6,800 but I can't say for sure since I don't have the info on hand and I haven't tested it. The 1998 didn't have a tach. So no idea on the 2.5 Lima. I doubt it's a high revving engine.

EDIT: The red line for the 4.0 SOHC is 6,000 RPM. 207 HP @ 5,250 RPM and 238 LB-FT @ 3,000 RPM
 
Last edited:

dvdswan

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Messages
2,857
Reaction score
3,010
Location
Seattle, WA
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ranger XLT 2WD
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
Keep your mind like an umbrella, it only works if its open... Continually learning.

scotts90ranger

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
8,531
Reaction score
5,092
Location
Dayton Oregon
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
All the Ranger fuel injected engines have rev limits, sometimes they're just random as it seems, they're at a safe place you "could" sit at for a long period and not hurt anything... Lima's are 6000rpm, the 4.0L in a '91 Explorer I had was I'm pretty sure 4600rpm, my 5L explorer is 5000rpm, couldn't tell you about the rest...

The tach is just a number, if you are going for something specific it's fine, I reference mine all the time on the '97 to make sure I'm cruising below 3000rpm to stay in closed loop fueling in a fuel mileage attempt or to remember what gear I'm in... I change my shift points based on how and where I'm driving, normal slow acceleration shift at 3k, harder shifting 4k, all out somewhere around 5500rpm...
 

pjtoledo

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
5,699
Reaction score
3,342
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle Year
20002005199
Make / Model
Fords
Engine Size
3.0 2.3
Not sure why they didn't, the 3 engines offered in 2004 have pretty much the same redline above 5,500

2.3l Duratec makes best torque at 3,750, best horsepower at 5,250
3.0l Vulcan makes best torque at 3,900, best HP at 5,200
4.0l SOHC has best torque at 3,000, best HP at 5,250

Best Torque decides when you shift if you want the fastest acceleration, so go 200rpm above best torque then shift to next gear, that should get next gear 200-300 below best torque RPM, so still in the power band of that engine

Generally speaking, in a 5-speed, gears 2, 3 and 4 will have a 500-600rpm difference
the last time I hit peak power in my 2000 3.0 whatever it was that I needed the power for was long gone.
 

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,287
Reaction score
14,294
Location
Jackson, NJ. And Manahawkin too.
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
the last time I hit peak power in my 2000 3.0 whatever it was that I needed the power for was long gone.
I knew the 3.0L was slow, but I didn’t realize it was that slow.

You did mean it that way, right?
 

pjtoledo

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
5,699
Reaction score
3,342
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle Year
20002005199
Make / Model
Fords
Engine Size
3.0 2.3
I knew the 3.0L was slow, but I didn’t realize it was that slow.

You did mean it that way, right?
yeah, this one is kind of slow. full throttle will wind it out to 5200, but anything over 4500 is slow progress.
it's an ex cab 4x4, auto. the 3.73 gears just aren't a good match, it struggles to maintain 70, down shifts for any kind of grade.
I once had some smaller tires on it, 225/70-15 and that made a big difference for only being 7% smaller.
4.10 gears are in the works, "soon" :icon_rofl:
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,364
Reaction score
8,405
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
The 3.0l Vulcan was designed in 1983/4 for use in the Brand New 1986 FWD Taurus/Sable models

The resulting engine was a clean-sheet, all metric design. The engine's 60° vee angle was chosen to help it fit into the Taurus' engine bay.
Displacement grew from an original 2.8 L to 3.0 L.
A variety of technologies were evaluated during development, including two different fuel injection systems, turbocharging, two sparkplugs per cylinder, variable displacement with cylinder deactivation, and Ford's experimental programmed combustion (PROCO) system
Power band/best torque varied thru out the years
165ft/lb @ 3600 RPM (1991 – 1995)
162 @ 3250 RPM (1996 – 1997)
178 @ 3750 RPM (1999)
190 @ 3650 RPM (2000 – 2001)
180 @ 3500 RPM (2002)
180 @ 3900 RPM (2003 – 2004)
180 @ 3950 RPM (2005 – 2007)

Most V6 and V8 engines do best torque at 2,500-3,000rpms
If driven that way the 3.0l becomes the 3.slow
It would be EXACTLY like driving around another V6 or V8 and keeping it under 2,000rpm, you would think its gutless as well :)

3.0l Vulcan was certainly no powerhouse, but it did what it was suppose to do in its comparison OHV engine sizes of the day
Had a 23 year run, 1986 thru 2008, very reliable for the most part
 
Last edited:

pjtoledo

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
5,699
Reaction score
3,342
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle Year
20002005199
Make / Model
Fords
Engine Size
3.0 2.3
I had an '87 Taurus wagon. the 3.0 was a good match and served me well for about 25 years.
 

scotts90ranger

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
8,531
Reaction score
5,092
Location
Dayton Oregon
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
It's literally just a red line on the tach, means almost nothing, just a visual guide that you are getting close to the rev limiter which is just the speed they decided that the engine should not exceed is which is the speed at which the engine should be able to run all day every day at... We build boat engines at work, I set the rev limits fairly low compared to automotive because in the jet boat world the prop load gets kinda dumb around 5000rpm so the highest rev limits we have are 5200rpm for the 6.2L LT4 supercharged engine, I set the EGT's and such to a point it can sit there at full load all day, sure it's probably not great on the rings, but it'll do it... well on that particular engine the intercooler won't keep up with it but whatever... The redline on the tach is just a visual thing. Before I climbed under my '97 to look at the diff tag I used the rev limit along with the speedo to help figure out what gears were in it by running the math, most people stress about rpm way too much...
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Members online

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


TexasDuck66
July Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

25th Anniversary Merch

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top