• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

More Bronco hear say.


Dirtman

Former Middleweight Moss Fighting Champion
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
19,304
Reaction score
13,326
Points
113
Location
41N 75W
Vehicle Year
2009
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
It's up there.
Total Drop
It's down there.
Tire Size
Round.
My credo
I poop in the furnace.
Wait... what the hell is wrong with eating crayons? How else am I suppose to feel colorful inside?
 


Jim Oaks

Just some guy with a website
Administrator
Founder / Site Owner
Supporting Vendor
Article Contributor
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Aug 2, 2000
Messages
13,507
Reaction score
8,734
Points
113
Location
Nocona, Texas
Vehicle Year
1996 / 2021
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 / 2.3 Ecoboost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6-inches
Tire Size
33x12.50x15
Ford will never build a truck exactly like we want. And you couldn't either. Sure, you could take the new Ranger and modify it or make suggestions, but could you design it from the ground up on a blank piece of paper or CAD screen? It would probably look like Tesla's truck. Actually, you guys could do way better than Tesla.

The problem is that we don't have that many engineers here in the U.S. Some of our greatest minds aren't working for Ford, Jeep, Dodge, or Chevy. They're building off-road desert trucks.

Did you know the engineering of the Jeep Gladiator was overseen by a woman?


Nothing against women. There are great female engineers out there.

I think the best race cars are designed by racers, and the best off-road trucks are designed by offroaders.

How do you recruit an engineering graduate to build an offroad truck when they drive a Prius and have no experience offroading? How do you design anything when you don't really understand how it will be used? Not well. When do you think the last time the engineers at Ford went offroading? And I mean true offroading. Not like the offroad course at the Ranger Media Drive in California (2018) that I could have done in 2WD.

The automotive industry, including Jeep, believes that only a small percentage of people actually take their vehicle offroad. And they're right. You know they're right. We've all seen those trucks, Jeeps, and SUV's with tires and lift kits that we know don't actually go offroad.

The new Bronco will be comfortable, ride nice, have electric lockers, terrain management, and stupid breadcrumbs to find your way home, but it's never going to be the old Bronco. It's never going to have the wheel travel potential to keep the tires on the ground. It will instead rely on an electric locker to turn the wheel that is actually touching the ground. When I take the new Ranger offroad, its lack of wheel travel makes it look like a dog taking a piss.



Would I like to have a new Bronco, probably. Do I expect it to be the perfect offroad vehicle off the dealer lot? No. Adventure vehicle maybe, off-roader...no.

I think Built will always outperform Bought.

Built not Bought.

We've been using that term for...what...decades now?
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,401
Reaction score
7,495
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
Nu-uh. Dirtman's trucks won't be comfortable on road.
Who cares? If they want on road comfort they can buy an edge or a IFS equipped 2wd. Do you think ford thought about road comfort in 1959 when they introduced the first factory 4wd? Doubtful.
Oh come on, all anyone around here would do is scrap all current vehicle production and focus on building a solid front axle ranger with a coyote engine and manual transmission. Which will somehow be carbureted because @rusty ol ranger will throw a tantrum during a board meeting if it isnt. Then most of us would get drunk and go play with the robots on the assembly line and @sheep herder would inevitably try to have sex with one of them.
Screw the coyote. If im on the board that SOB is getting a Carburated godzilla, backed by a ZF6 and a 4.30 rear.
Besides, buying up all of the shares was my idea. *I*'m the CEO.
Armwrestle ya for the CEO position.
 

sheep herder

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
1,403
Reaction score
1,024
Points
113
Location
sheep pen
Vehicle Year
2011
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
If it ain't broke, break it.
Oh come on, all anyone around here would do is scrap all current vehicle production and focus on building a solid front axle ranger with a coyote engine and manual transmission. Which will somehow be carbureted because @rusty ol ranger will throw a tantrum during a board meeting if it isnt. Then most of us would get drunk and go play with the robots on the assembly line and @sheep herder would inevitably try to have sex with one of them.
 

OldMan2

Active Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2019
Messages
188
Reaction score
233
Points
43
Location
BuckRidge, GA
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
Do your best to be your best.
Maybe Dirtman in charge of trucks and you in charge of cars? I like his ideas for the Ranger... Then Jim as the fearless leader can try to keep the two of you from fighting and eating crayons all day.
Put Dirtman in charge of design and oversight of the "Limited CHOWDA Edition."
 

Grumpaw

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Mar 20, 2019
Messages
2,189
Reaction score
1,504
Points
113
Location
Virginia
Vehicle Year
2009
Make / Model
Ford Ranger XL
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
Stock
Total Drop
Stock
Tire Size
Stock 225/70/15
My credo
I don't count birthday's anymore...just happy to be looking down at the ground instead of looking up
Put Dirtman in charge of design and oversight of the "Limited CHOWDA Edition."
Have it equipped with a small furnace in the bed and equip the engine to run on poop fumes !!! ;missingteeth;
Grumpaw
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,342
Reaction score
17,838
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
Ford will never build a truck exactly like we want. And you couldn't either. Sure, you could take the new Ranger and modify it or make suggestions, but could you design it from the ground up on a blank piece of paper or CAD screen? It would probably look like Tesla's truck. Actually, you guys could do way better than Tesla.

The problem is that we don't have that many engineers here in the U.S. Some of our greatest minds aren't working for Ford, Jeep, Dodge, or Chevy. They're building off-road desert trucks.

Did you know the engineering of the Jeep Gladiator was overseen by a woman?


Nothing against women. There are great female engineers out there.

I think the best race cars are designed by racers, and the best off-road trucks are designed by offroaders.

How do you recruit an engineering graduate to build an offroad truck when they drive a Prius and have no experience offroading? How do you design anything when you don't really understand how it will be used? Not well. When do you think the last time the engineers at Ford went offroading? And I mean true offroading. Not like the offroad course at the Ranger Media Drive in California (2018) that I could have done in 2WD.

The automotive industry, including Jeep, believes that only a small percentage of people actually take their vehicle offroad. And they're right. You know they're right. We've all seen those trucks, Jeeps, and SUV's with tires and lift kits that we know don't actually go offroad.

The new Bronco will be comfortable, ride nice, have electric lockers, terrain management, and stupid breadcrumbs to find your way home, but it's never going to be the old Bronco. It's never going to have the wheel travel potential to keep the tires on the ground. It will instead rely on an electric locker to turn the wheel that is actually touching the ground. When I take the new Ranger offroad, its lack of wheel travel makes it look like a dog taking a piss.



Would I like to have a new Bronco, probably. Do I expect it to be the perfect offroad vehicle off the dealer lot? No. Adventure vehicle maybe, off-roader...no.

I think Built will always outperform Bought.

Built not Bought.

We've been using that term for...what...decades now?
On the flipside the 19+ Ranger is probably the best offroad Ranger built off the showroom floor. AT tires sadly set it above most Rangers (mine shipped on all season 205/75-15's) let alone the factory elocker. Front flex is sad but it always has been out of the box.

Engineers don't really "design" the vehicle. It isn't like sitting in the garage and deciding "I am going to do it this way" and you do it that way and all is right with the world. Generally they are told something like "we want it to do this and look like that and of course as cheap as possible, make it work" If you don't play by their rules they find someone that will. Its amazing we get as good of product as we do and not a bunch of camels (it is said a camel is a horse designed by a committee)

When I was in college my big dream was to design for Ford.
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,401
Reaction score
7,495
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
Maybe not...but i highly doubt a new 19 would outwheel an 83-97 STX/offroad package truck. Maybe in the desert or something...but the 19 is wider, less flexy, and probably doesnt have the ground clearence of the early ones.
 

fastpakr

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
U.S. Military - Veteran
V8 Engine Swap
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,018
Reaction score
2,834
Points
113
Location
Roanoke, VA
Vehicle Year
1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
285/75-16
From memory it has quite a bit more ground clearance (primarily due to the space for fitting larger tires out of the box).
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,342
Reaction score
17,838
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
Maybe not...but i highly doubt a new 19 would outwheel an 83-97 STX/offroad package truck. Maybe in the desert or something...but the 19 is wider, less flexy, and probably doesnt have the ground clearence of the early ones.
Just a 2" lift the same springs as everyone else with the same crappy donut tires and stiff front springs... no answer for the e-locker or AT tires (as mediocre as they are).

Stock front suspension supporting a V8, look at all that flex:



It is stuffing the rear that hard and it had Explorer springs in the back... we won't even talk about how the pinstripes are nowhere close to lining up...

STX was just an appearance package, they spacered the factory suspension lower and added a bunch of visual do-dads (grille guards, tube bumpers, rollbars etc) Lift and front driveshaft (fixed output at t-case) it didn't have much over a generic truck.
 
Last edited:

91stranger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
512
Points
113
Location
Whats round on the sides and hi in the middle-OHIO
Vehicle Year
2003
Make / Model
Gets Mo Chicks
Engine Size
4.2 straight six powered by gremlins, goblins and mudbloods.
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Hard to have facts when you don't work at ford or when the damn thing isn't even out of production yet.... until ford builds something that makes me say "wow" then its just the same ol stuff with a different name on it. I'd like to see a head to head competition between the new bronco, jeep wrangler, gladiator, Tacoma, and the Colorado.

After seeing Jims picture of his truck barely flexing it reminded me of the new ranger vs Tacoma where the Tacomas wheels were all on the ground when the rangers back tire was about 5 inches in the air. They say the tacomas have a fully boxed frame up to the bed and then it turns into just a c-channel frame which allows more articulation than the ranger. Wheels won't grab when they are in the air lol. Not sure how the frame is on the new ranger, is it fully boxed?
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,342
Reaction score
17,838
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
After seeing Jims picture of his truck barely flexing it reminded me of the new ranger vs Tacoma where the Tacomas wheels were all on the ground when the rangers back tire was about 5 inches in the air. They say the tacomas have a fully boxed frame up to the bed and then it turns into just a c-channel frame which allows more articulation than the ranger. Wheels won't grab when they are in the air lol. Not sure how the frame is on the new ranger, is it fully boxed?
Ranger is fully boxed which is better. Stronger, more rigid, more predictable... whatever you want to call it. Fullsize trucks have been going to it since 2004. Most of Toyota's more durable vehicles (like Land Cruisers) have had a boxed frame longer than that.

The 1910's tech C channel frame for more "articulation" is Toyota's excuse for falling behind the times due to lack of competition over the last couple years. They make the same kind of sad story for still running drum brakes (they supposedly don't get as much debris in them, they just thought of everything :rolleyes:) in the back of the Taco too. But again, Land Cruisers (which are kind of a Chuck Norris of 4wd's) get disk brakes to go with their boxed frame.



But hey, they finally put power seats in the Taco last year... that is some cutting edge stuff there.
 
Last edited:

Dirtman

Former Middleweight Moss Fighting Champion
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
19,304
Reaction score
13,326
Points
113
Location
41N 75W
Vehicle Year
2009
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
It's up there.
Total Drop
It's down there.
Tire Size
Round.
My credo
I poop in the furnace.
You people are nuts. Half of time you're complaining there's too much technology then 5 minutes later your complaining there's not enough technology.

Everyone go stand in the corner until you make up your mind! Rusty is exempted from this punishment since he has always been adamantly clear on his opinion.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,342
Reaction score
17,838
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
You people are nuts. Half of time you're complaining there's too much technology then 5 minutes later your complaining there's not enough technology.

Everyone go stand in the corner until you make up your mind! Rusty is exempted from this punishment since he has always been adamantly clear on his opinion.
Can't have both?

I have 4 wheel disk brakes in my '85... I can't do much about the flexi flier frame though.

Given the option I would like a solid front axle though. I would be a fickle customer to please...
 
Last edited:

91stranger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
512
Points
113
Location
Whats round on the sides and hi in the middle-OHIO
Vehicle Year
2003
Make / Model
Gets Mo Chicks
Engine Size
4.2 straight six powered by gremlins, goblins and mudbloods.
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
I wouldn't say its an excuse on Toyota's part. It honestly sounds like they are keeping shit simple compared to everyone else which is a point everyone seems to make. Dirtman nailed it on the head honestly. Everyone cries that theres too much tech and then get mad they didn't have power seats. Oh and they have a manual transmission available too. Go to 7:12 minutes and they show the articulation difference. Its pretty substantial when talking about rock crawling or trail riding.

 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top