• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

d44 knuckles or d44 sas?


maroon ranger

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Location
East Helena, Montana
Vehicle Year
1994 4.0L proje
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
so guys...i am having one hell of a time deciding on what i wanna do and what would be cheaper on my 94 ranger. My thoughts were to lift the truck with skyjacker brackets and extended radius arms with dana 44 knuckles on the outers of the dana 35 arms and with chevy leafs with belltech shackles in the back.

Then a buddy of mine got me thinkin in putting a dana44 solid axle under there with springs and radius arms with the chevy leafs and bellteh shackles out back.

I cant choose! i do wheel it alot and have a solid piece drive shaft and an explorer 8.8 with discs in the back with limited slip. it's only a 3.0L that is about to go tits up but i got a new truck and am lookin to make the ranger a project truck, so you can get the idea, hahaha.
 


Downey

New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2008
Messages
1,754
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Muncy, PA
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
sas it with coils
 

twoll86

Member
U.S. Military - Active
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
383
Reaction score
9
Points
18
Age
38
Location
caseyville,il
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
44 knuckle swap
 

ChrisR1S

10/2013 STOTM Winner
Supporting Member
V8 Engine Swap
MTOTM Winner
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
746
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Location
Southern Virginia
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
Mild 5.0
Transmission
Manual
Personally i would just holdout till the ranger isnt the DD any longer; then let the fun stuff begin like SAS and maybe address the 3.slow.
its what im doing and it really gives you time to fine tune things and do them right instead of rushing so you can say... have a ride to work tomorrow!
 

94BonB

New Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Vehicle Year
2002
1987
Make / Model
Ranger, Ranger
Engine Size
4.0L, 5.8L
Transmission
Automatic
Last edited:

dangerranger83

5.0 HO under the hood!!!
Supporting Member
V8 Engine Swap
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Apr 26, 2009
Messages
7,738
Reaction score
54
Points
0
Location
Lafayette, IN
Vehicle Year
1983
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
5.0 HO carbed with an np435 and np208
Transmission
Manual
I would do the SAS with coils.
 

levi17

New Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
st. helens oregon
Vehicle Year
1984
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
4.0!
Transmission
Manual
4.0 swap is pretty simple just takes a little time, i have an 84 ranger with 2.8 i swapped in a 4.0 and i can't wait
 

4x4junkie

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
10,757
Reaction score
584
Points
113
Location
So. Calif (SFV)
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
Bronco II
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
2.9L V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
35x12.50R15
What is your goal here? What size tires, how much lift, etc.?

The Knuckles swap (or the whole D44) will get you bigger brakes, but changes your lug pattern.

The TTB suspension is good up to 6" lift, but above that the steering gets impractical to deal with (SA steering works better at 8" & up).

Overall strength is going to be pretty much the same no matter which way you go with it (there is a minor strength increase with the D44 axle stubs vs. the D35's, but more often than not a u-joint will still be the first thing to let go).
 
Last edited:

Bent Bolt

Active Member
Ford Technician
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
1,433
Reaction score
4
Points
38
Age
54
Location
Edmonton,AB
Vehicle Year
1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
Supercharged 4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
Solid Axle Swap 4x4
Yeah , you really need to sit down and figure out what your ultimate goal is. If trail riding and no bigger than a 35" tire, the D35 is good.

You going mudding ? The D35 is a plow so a D44 and 36"ish tires will be OK

You wanna run with the big guys? 37" , 40" tires ? skip the D44 and go D60.

I am going to do a D44 spindle and rotor swap in the spring so I can get a wider track , bigger tires and pound on the truck a bit harder. But still doesn't address the plow effect that I get going through deep snow and mud with the D35. At this point of the truck build, I kinda regret not going SA but I have too much time and $$ invested to give up on the D35 just yet.
 

maroon ranger

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Location
East Helena, Montana
Vehicle Year
1994 4.0L proje
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
well i would like enough lift to clear 35s...which i can do with the sky jacker...maybe a fender mod. But i was lookin a wahlstrom's sas ranger and the one mentioned in the link 94BonB mentioned and those are ultimate goals of what i want my ranger to be.

so with my mind set on sas what is the easiest way to figure out the steering when the axle is thrown in and where i like it?
 

94BonB

New Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Vehicle Year
2002
1987
Make / Model
Ranger, Ranger
Engine Size
4.0L, 5.8L
Transmission
Automatic
Your best bet for steering is a high steer set up. I have read that just running the stock style steering set up on a ranger with SA will have a pretty noticeable decrease in steering radius, while running a high steer set up will actually increase your steering radius slightly. That and if your ultimate goal is a truck like the one mentioned on the link and your going to be wheeling it hard, then a high steer is the obvious choice. As far is steering set up, just get the axle where you want it and measure for your links. Use 1-ton rod ends and make sure that your track-bar(panhard bar) link for the suspension and drag link for your steering are as close to equal length as possible and as close to parallel as possible. This is done to eliminate bump steer.
 

86ford

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
1,450
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
rocky river ohio
Vehicle Year
1992
Make / Model
FORD
Engine Size
4.0, abused and misunderstood
Transmission
Manual
If you are going to be REALLY wheeling I would swap in a d44. The d35 is a PITA when its locked and you cant run hydro assist steering. If you are content with a open front you can run a d35 up to 35s. A d44 can be filled with bling bling stuff and run up to 37s or 38s without much if any failure.

86
 

4x4junkie

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
10,757
Reaction score
584
Points
113
Location
So. Calif (SFV)
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
Bronco II
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
2.9L V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
35x12.50R15
×2 on the high-steer setup if you go SAS.
High steer will get rid of some of the suspension's quirkiness from having the draglink & trackbar running down at a steep angle as well if you put a lot of lift on it (which it sounds like what you're looking for).


If you are going to be REALLY wheeling I would swap in a d44. The d35 is a PITA when its locked and you cant run hydro assist steering. If you are content with a open front you can run a d35 up to 35s. A d44 can be filled with bling bling stuff and run up to 37s or 38s without much if any failure.

86
Completely untrue. The centerlink on a K-link setup gives you the perfect place for a hydro assist ram (which I've been going back & forth with the thought of putting on mine). I've heard of a couple people rigging one up on the stock steering too, although that's a bit hack IMO.

But blinging out a D44 is gonna run you what just getting a D60 would cost (and still not be as strong). Might as well go for the good stuff if you're going to do that.
 

maroon ranger

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Location
East Helena, Montana
Vehicle Year
1994 4.0L proje
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
yep...my plans are to timber wheel and some snow wheelin for it. and thanks alot for the advice guys...i got exactly what i wanted out of my question. now i need a recomendation of a d-44 axle...i would do the early bronco with radius arms but finding one of those is like winning the lottery. I read something about an 03 jeep d44 with 5 on 4.5 bolt pattern...but are those a high pinion? What is a list of hp axles with disc brakes with generally the high count of splines...im not sure of the spline count for d44's.
 

4x4junkie

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
10,757
Reaction score
584
Points
113
Location
So. Calif (SFV)
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
Bronco II
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
2.9L V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
35x12.50R15
The EB D44 is weaker than what you have now anyway (smaller u-joints). It's also a lo-pinion too.

I would be looking for the axles out of a '76-'79 F-150 or Bronco. Being that you want to lift it pretty high, their extra width will go a long way in keeping the rubber side down.

Also, virtually all D44s are 30 spline with either 27 or 19 spline outer stubs (the 19 being a coarse spline, and the most common). Only some very early D44s have 19 spline inner shafts.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Members online

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top