James Morse
1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2021
- Messages
- 1,891
- Reaction score
- 975
- Location
- Roanoke VA
- Vehicle Year
- 1997 and 1999
- Make / Model
- XLT 4x4 & B3000
- Engine Type
- 4.0 V6
- Engine Size
- 4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
- Transmission
- Automatic
- 2WD / 4WD
- 4WD
- Tire Size
- 31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
- My credo
- The perfect is the enemy of the good.
It could be a little noisy.
Doing a reality check on my logic, see if this makes sense.
1. I only got the '97 because I wanted 4x4. The plan was, if I could get into 4x4 for $10k, and sell the Mazda for $5k, that would be only $5k out of pocket - a serious upgrade for not much cash. Granted that now I have both and don't want to part with the Mazda as it's all sorted, and gives me a spare vehicle, and actually I often use it going to store because the XLT is like, almost perfect, and I don't want dings, the Mazda, not perfect, cosmetically. So I kind of am abandoning the original plan, not saying I won't eventually sell the Mazda, but $5k isn't going to kill me one way or the other. The point of all that is that -if- I keep the Mazda, then I always have a 4x2 daily driver if I want. I'm losing interest on $5k cash, and the Mazda will devalue, but, not too much. I don't know what I'd get for it, but I think $5k would be about average. And yes I could use the $5k for upgrades on the XLT, but, it's not a must, XLT I expected to put some money into it anyway one way or the other and so far I have spent almost nothing on it.
2. In light of the above, the '97 is really just something I wanted, so, you could say, a toy, or, "recreational" vehicle. Versus a need (unless you get addicted to 4x4 then it's a need, lol).
3. I hardly ever go out of town and when I do it's almost always on my way to 4x4.
4. If we went on extensive long highway trips I'd either rent a car or more likely take the Lexus. No sense to put thousands of miles on the XLT.
5. So the XLT can be more/less dedicated to 4x4 but I still want it at least driveable on the highway and those tires should be fine for that, not ideal, but shouldn't be horrible.
6. Tentative upgrades for the XLT include things that are all 4x4 oriented. This upgrade puts the tire size back to oem size, gives me a bit more clearance, and should look great.
7. These tires seem like they'd be good for the kind of thing I run into so far. Would also work ok in snow, or so they say; not a snow tire, but I don't think you'd be stuck either.
8. They are symmetric, which you don't see a lot (look the same side-to-side). That's not a requirement for me, just a plus. Nice open tread so rocks don't stick in them. Very aggressive look to them but not too crazy. Yes you can only rotate front/rear.
9. If they were horrible they can be changed in the future, tires aren't permanent. Alternatives - K03 probably or others that have been mentioned in other thread about this. Lots of good choices, but not as aggressive as these. I do run into mud and the rest of the time it's dirt and rocks of all various sizes. I go through a lot of creeks.
I'm still mulling it over, and normally I wouldn't look at something quite so aggressive if I had just one truck and if I were, say, commuting to work, but that's not the situation. There is nowhere I -have- to be, well, let's say it's real rare. So my thinking is telling me, it's ok if they are a little noisy, because when you do get to your 4x4 road, you have something that should be up to the task (for the tires, anyway). And the whole reason I got the XLT was for 4x4, so why not gravitate more that direction.
I don't think this is a tire many people here have? If you do I'd sure like to hear about it. I've been thinking about this a few months, got lots of help here, and would like to pull the trigger on something this spring. Comments?
RBP Repulsor MT 31x10.50R15LT | RBPMT15105010 | Custom Offsets (customwheeloffset.com)
Doing a reality check on my logic, see if this makes sense.
1. I only got the '97 because I wanted 4x4. The plan was, if I could get into 4x4 for $10k, and sell the Mazda for $5k, that would be only $5k out of pocket - a serious upgrade for not much cash. Granted that now I have both and don't want to part with the Mazda as it's all sorted, and gives me a spare vehicle, and actually I often use it going to store because the XLT is like, almost perfect, and I don't want dings, the Mazda, not perfect, cosmetically. So I kind of am abandoning the original plan, not saying I won't eventually sell the Mazda, but $5k isn't going to kill me one way or the other. The point of all that is that -if- I keep the Mazda, then I always have a 4x2 daily driver if I want. I'm losing interest on $5k cash, and the Mazda will devalue, but, not too much. I don't know what I'd get for it, but I think $5k would be about average. And yes I could use the $5k for upgrades on the XLT, but, it's not a must, XLT I expected to put some money into it anyway one way or the other and so far I have spent almost nothing on it.
2. In light of the above, the '97 is really just something I wanted, so, you could say, a toy, or, "recreational" vehicle. Versus a need (unless you get addicted to 4x4 then it's a need, lol).
3. I hardly ever go out of town and when I do it's almost always on my way to 4x4.
4. If we went on extensive long highway trips I'd either rent a car or more likely take the Lexus. No sense to put thousands of miles on the XLT.
5. So the XLT can be more/less dedicated to 4x4 but I still want it at least driveable on the highway and those tires should be fine for that, not ideal, but shouldn't be horrible.
6. Tentative upgrades for the XLT include things that are all 4x4 oriented. This upgrade puts the tire size back to oem size, gives me a bit more clearance, and should look great.
7. These tires seem like they'd be good for the kind of thing I run into so far. Would also work ok in snow, or so they say; not a snow tire, but I don't think you'd be stuck either.
8. They are symmetric, which you don't see a lot (look the same side-to-side). That's not a requirement for me, just a plus. Nice open tread so rocks don't stick in them. Very aggressive look to them but not too crazy. Yes you can only rotate front/rear.
9. If they were horrible they can be changed in the future, tires aren't permanent. Alternatives - K03 probably or others that have been mentioned in other thread about this. Lots of good choices, but not as aggressive as these. I do run into mud and the rest of the time it's dirt and rocks of all various sizes. I go through a lot of creeks.
I'm still mulling it over, and normally I wouldn't look at something quite so aggressive if I had just one truck and if I were, say, commuting to work, but that's not the situation. There is nowhere I -have- to be, well, let's say it's real rare. So my thinking is telling me, it's ok if they are a little noisy, because when you do get to your 4x4 road, you have something that should be up to the task (for the tires, anyway). And the whole reason I got the XLT was for 4x4, so why not gravitate more that direction.
I don't think this is a tire many people here have? If you do I'd sure like to hear about it. I've been thinking about this a few months, got lots of help here, and would like to pull the trigger on something this spring. Comments?
RBP Repulsor MT 31x10.50R15LT | RBPMT15105010 | Custom Offsets (customwheeloffset.com)