• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

1975 Ford Ranger F100 XLT




rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,407
Reaction score
7,502
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
Another classic ruined.
 

19Walt93

Well-Known Member
Ford Technician
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
4,515
Reaction score
4,467
Points
113
Location
Canaan,NH
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
351
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
3"
Tire Size
235/55R16
My credo
If you don't have time to do it right will you have time to do it over?
I kind of like it but I'd want slightly taller tires and the rear wheels to be centered in the wheel opening. I was working on new 75 F100's, the 300 sixes were bulletproof but we had no end of problems with the 360's and 390's due to worn out machining equipment at the factory.
 

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,092
Reaction score
13,654
Points
113
Location
Jackson, NJ
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,407
Reaction score
7,502
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
Dude cmon. This things on a different level. Atlrast you kept the factory chassis so in theory it could be put back original.
 

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,092
Reaction score
13,654
Points
113
Location
Jackson, NJ
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
Dude cmon. This things on a different level. Atlrast you kept the factory chassis so in theory it could be put back original.
Actually... This is exactly what I’m doing. I’m looking for a newer Superduty chassis to put my ‘79 body on. I don’t plan on changing much of anything on the body. I plan on modifying the chassis to fit the body. I just want 4wd with better handling and ride.
From the looks of this, he did the same thing only with a car chassis. I think the 73-79 body was the nicest looking trucks ford designed, but there’s room for improvement on the chassis.
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,407
Reaction score
7,502
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
Actually... This is exactly what I’m doing. I’m looking for a newer Superduty chassis to put my ‘79 body on. I don’t plan on changing much of anything on the body. I plan on modifying the chassis to fit the body. I just want 4wd with better handling and ride.
From the looks of this, he did the same thing only with a car chassis. I think the 73-79 body was the nicest looking trucks ford designed, but there’s room for improvement on the chassis.
Ive never had an issue with the chassis. They perform just fine as a truck.
 

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,092
Reaction score
13,654
Points
113
Location
Jackson, NJ
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
Ive never had an issue with the chassis. They perform just fine as a truck.
That doesn’t mean there isn’t tons of room for improvement... that just means you find it acceptable. You can’t honestly tell me that a 70’s F250 and a 2012 F250 ride, handle, or perform anywhere near the same. I know for a fact that the newer truck can out accelerate, out brake, and pretty much out do a 70’s truck in every category except style.
I prefer old steel with a new feel.
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,407
Reaction score
7,502
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
That doesn’t mean there isn’t tons of room for improvement... that just means you find it acceptable. You can’t honestly tell me that a 70’s F250 and a 2012 F250 ride, handle, or perform anywhere near the same. I know for a fact that the newer truck can out accelerate, out brake, and pretty much out do a 70’s truck in every category except style.
I prefer old steel with a new feel.
Out accelerate? A hopped up 460, 4 speed, and a set of 4.10s against a 6.2L im saying the 460 is gonna take it.

Braking? Start stopping sooner. Pretty easy. Stuff ran out infront of people in the 70s too. Something tells me that assuming the braking system on the dentside is in good working order the difference here wouldnt be as much as you think.

Towing the 2012 has an advantage, but once again a hopped up 460 isnt going to have an issue in the power dept and trailer brakes have come a long way. Id also be willing to bet actual payload capacity is also pretty close when you figure in the 70s truck being considerably lighter then the superduty.
 

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,092
Reaction score
13,654
Points
113
Location
Jackson, NJ
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
Out accelerate? A hopped up 460, 4 speed, and a set of 4.10s against a 6.2L im saying the 460 is gonna take it.

Braking? Start stopping sooner. Pretty easy. Stuff ran out infront of people in the 70s too. Something tells me that assuming the braking system on the dentside is in good working order the difference here wouldnt be as much as you think.

Towing the 2012 has an advantage, but once again a hopped up 460 isnt going to have an issue in the power dept and trailer brakes have come a long way. Id also be willing to bet actual payload capacity is also pretty close when you figure in the 70s truck being considerably lighter then the superduty.
Believe whatever you want...
Compare a a “hopped up 460” to a stock 6.2l so you can live in your 1970s fantasy world. Keep imagining that 1975 drum brakes are as good as 2012 disc brakes.
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,407
Reaction score
7,502
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
Believe whatever you want...
Compare a a “hopped up 460” to a stock 6.2l so you can live in your 1970s fantasy world. Keep imagining that 1975 drum brakes are as good as 2012 disc brakes.
Later 70s Disc/drum combos stopped damn good.

A stock 6.2 is what...400ish ftlbs in 2012? A carbed STOCK 460 was in the 380 range. It wouldnt take much.

You might beat it on the highway...but if youre towing the kinda weight it would take to make either engine snort 55-60 is the fastest you shoild be going anyway.
 

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,092
Reaction score
13,654
Points
113
Location
Jackson, NJ
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
Later 70s Disc/drum combos stopped damn good.

A stock 6.2 is what...400ish ftlbs in 2012? A carbed STOCK 460 was in the 380 range. It wouldnt take much.

You might beat it on the highway...but if youre towing the kinda weight it would take to make either engine snort 55-60 is the fastest you shoild be going anyway.
A newer Superduty stops better. Enough that my 66 year old neighbor, who claims to drive like “a little old lady when he’s towing his Bobcat”, tells me there’s a world a difference between his ‘79 f350 and his ‘99 f350.

So stock vs stock the 6.2 is a little better?

Glad we agree.
 

MikeG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
752
Points
113
Location
central Texas
Vehicle Year
1997
Make / Model
B4000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
2"
Tire Size
235/75r15
460 better? Sure, it's better for gas station owners, oil refineries.... ;)
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,407
Reaction score
7,502
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
A newer Superduty stops better. Enough that my 66 year old neighbor, who claims to drive like “a little old lady when he’s towing his Bobcat”, tells me there’s a world a difference between his ‘79 f350 and his ‘99 f350.

So stock vs stock the 6.2 is a little better?

Glad we agree.
Not enough to justify ripping apart a late 70s 3/4 ton just to mount it on the SD chassis. Unless the 70s truck is rotted underneath.

If not sell it to someone who'll apperciate it and just buy a damn superduty instead of bastardizing something that get more scarce everyday.
 

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,092
Reaction score
13,654
Points
113
Location
Jackson, NJ
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
Not enough to justify ripping apart a late 70s 3/4 ton just to mount it on the SD chassis. Unless the 70s truck is rotted underneath.

If not sell it to someone who'll apperciate it and just buy a damn superduty instead of bastardizing something that get more scarce everyday.
Does it really matter???
Biden is just going to label all vehicles built before 2002 as gross polluters and outlaw them. You’ll have to buy an electric car.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top