• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

10" Drum Upgrade worth it?


ratdude747

Member
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
503
Reaction score
22
Points
18
Age
31
Location
Madison, IN
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Tire Size
215/70R15
My BII had a plastic diff cover, FYI, so I don't think that being plastic makes it an 8.8 for sure.

Edit: grabbed the owner's manual, it shows 3.08 gears with 4.0 and standard cab if I'm reading it right.

Can't believe Ford would go to the trouble of making two different drum brake sizes, all that would seem to accomplish would be to make the supply chain more complicated. Who knows......

Mine is definitely RABS, listed on the window sticker
When I changed the fluid awhile back, I bought an 8.8" gasket and the bolts matched up. Leaked terribly (ended up redoing it with The Right Stuff instead), but the bolts matched, confirming it is an 8.8.

My 1995 3.0 I had before had a 7.5 in it... metal cover. So does the 8.8 in my 1984 F150.
 


MikeG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
752
Points
113
Location
central Texas
Vehicle Year
1997
Make / Model
B4000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
2"
Tire Size
235/75r15
My BII had a plastic diff cover, kind of dumb for a 4x4. Got a steel 7.5 diff cover from the JY. My two wheel drive pickup has a steel diff cover, go figure.... sometimes Ford makes no sense at all.
 

Dirtman

Former Middleweight Moss Fighting Champion
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
19,304
Reaction score
13,326
Points
113
Location
41N 75W
Vehicle Year
2009
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
It's up there.
Total Drop
It's down there.
Tire Size
Round.
My credo
I poop in the furnace.
Plastic does have a very distinct advantage of not rusting. I've seen plenty of steel diff covers with rust holes in them. I still wouldn't use a plastic diff cover, but there is a rationale to it.
 

franklin2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2019
Messages
3,427
Reaction score
1,758
Points
113
Location
Virginia
Vehicle Year
1984
Make / Model
Bronco II
Transmission
Manual
Can't believe Ford would go to the trouble of making two different drum brake sizes, all that would seem to accomplish would be to make the supply chain more complicated. Who knows......
After you own and work on Fords for awhile, you get used to this. Don't try to figure out the reasoning behind anything they do.
 

adsm08

Senior Master Grease Monkey
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
34,623
Reaction score
3,613
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
My BII had a plastic diff cover, FYI, so I don't think that being plastic makes it an 8.8 for sure.

Edit: grabbed the owner's manual, it shows 3.08 gears with 4.0 and standard cab if I'm reading it right.

Can't believe Ford would go to the trouble of making two different drum brake sizes, all that would seem to accomplish would be to make the supply chain more complicated. Who knows......

Mine is definitely RABS, listed on the window sticker

Having the two sets of brakes didn't complicate the supply chain at all. The 7.5 with eh 9" brakes was already a thing, the 8.8. with the 10" brakes was already a thing in other vehicles. The 10" backing plate with the smaller hub pattern for the 28 spline 8.8 was the only "extra" part.

And no, the plastic cover means nothing. The 7.5 in my B2 has it, none of the 8.8s I've ever had did, but I've seen 8.8s with plastic covers, and owned 7.5s with metal ones.
 

MikeG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
752
Points
113
Location
central Texas
Vehicle Year
1997
Make / Model
B4000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
2"
Tire Size
235/75r15
But the factory would have to keep track of which 8.8 went on which 4.0.... I guess they already had a 7.5 axle, eh what's one more part in the chain. You have to wonder if a 4.0 ever went out with a 7.5 axle by mistake, or an 8.8 going out with one of the smaller engines.

I've worked on a Model T, so yeah I've seen some questionable engineering!
 

ratdude747

Member
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
503
Reaction score
22
Points
18
Age
31
Location
Madison, IN
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Tire Size
215/70R15
Looked underneath... it's a 3.08. Why I had "2.80" in my memory, I dunno.
 

19Walt93

Well-Known Member
Ford Technician
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
4,515
Reaction score
4,465
Points
113
Location
Canaan,NH
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
351
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
3"
Tire Size
235/55R16
My credo
If you don't have time to do it right will you have time to do it over?
3.08's with an overdrive transmission wouldn't work here, I hope you live in a flat area. Plastic rear end covers, intake manifolds, valve covers, etc. weigh less than steel or aluminum, that's why they use them. Less weight has the same effect as adding power but also increases gas mileage. And they don't rust or corrode. It's easy to tell a 7.5 from an 8.8: 7.5 rear covers are flat top and bottom with curved sides and an 8.8 looks like a square with the corners rounded off.
55501
 

Dirtman

Former Middleweight Moss Fighting Champion
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
19,304
Reaction score
13,326
Points
113
Location
41N 75W
Vehicle Year
2009
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
It's up there.
Total Drop
It's down there.
Tire Size
Round.
My credo
I poop in the furnace.

adsm08

Senior Master Grease Monkey
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
34,623
Reaction score
3,613
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
But the factory would have to keep track of which 8.8 went on which 4.0.... I guess they already had a 7.5 axle, eh what's one more part in the chain. You have to wonder if a 4.0 ever went out with a 7.5 axle by mistake, or an 8.8 going out with one of the smaller engines.

I've worked on a Model T, so yeah I've seen some questionable engineering!
The 8.8 was an option on the smaller engines, and was quite common on V6 4x4 trucks. I know a guy here in town who has owned at least 1 3.0, 4x4, 8.8 Ranger.
 

MikeG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
752
Points
113
Location
central Texas
Vehicle Year
1997
Make / Model
B4000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
2"
Tire Size
235/75r15
Huh. Did not know that. Guess when you ordered out of the book back then, you got what you wanted (hopefully).

I've known multiple people who ordered vehicles out of a book, but none of them recently.
 

ratdude747

Member
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
503
Reaction score
22
Points
18
Age
31
Location
Madison, IN
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Tire Size
215/70R15
3.08's with an overdrive transmission wouldn't work here, I hope you live in a flat area. Plastic rear end covers, intake manifolds, valve covers, etc. weigh less than steel or aluminum, that's why they use them. Less weight has the same effect as adding power but also increases gas mileage. And they don't rust or corrode. It's easy to tell a 7.5 from an 8.8: 7.5 rear covers are flat top and bottom with curved sides and an 8.8 looks like a square with the corners rounded off.View attachment 55501
In the 1995 4.0 Ranger, the 3.08 does fine. No real complaints.

In the 1984 4.9 F150 (AOD trans), its 3.08 is honestly gutless. Highway driving (in anything but purely flat land) is almost impossible to use cruise control without the engine bogging or constant gear shifting (depending on how the TV cable is tuned). I've considered regearing it slightly, but I haven't felt like spending the money and time on it. I know of people with similar stock (or close to stock) carbed I6's who have 3.08's and love them... but AFAIK they're all running C6's (which have no OD, obviously).
 
Last edited:

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top