• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

What years offer 3l and 4x4?


dauphija#99

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
258
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Location
Chester,Nova Scotia
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3l 4 cyl
Transmission
Manual
While searching for a new truck, I came across a ranger with 4x4 with a 3.0l. I was under the impression that you could only get 4x4 with the 4.0l.This one was a 1999, what other years offer the 4x4 and the 3.0l combo?
 


Sunk

New Member
Supporting Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Aug 19, 2007
Messages
6,657
Reaction score
125
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Everett, WA
Vehicle Year
2012
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.5 Eco
Transmission
Automatic
I'm pretty sure the 3.0 was available in 4x4 trucks throughout its entire run...
 

Boggin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
5,711
Reaction score
48
Points
48
Transmission
Manual
4x4 doesnt really have much to do with engine size. Ive had 2,9s and 3.0s in 4wd, you could get 4 bangers, 2.8s, 2.9s, 3.0s, and 4.0s like you said
 

dauphija#99

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
258
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Location
Chester,Nova Scotia
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3l 4 cyl
Transmission
Manual
oh i seen so many 4l 4x4 and they were so common i thought it was just them
edit post 200
 
Last edited:

02RangerXLT

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
2,691
Reaction score
53
Points
0
Location
NE
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
I had a 2000 3.0 Supercab 4x4... and for what it was worth it was a dog... had no nut at all. Got good fuel mileage though. Averaged 19, but going any faster than 65 the mileage dropped considerably. Going 75, i got about 14mpg... In my 4.0 going 80, I get about 20 or 21 mpg... goofy ain't it?
 

dauphija#99

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
258
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Location
Chester,Nova Scotia
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3l 4 cyl
Transmission
Manual
thanks. so you guys recommend the 4l 4x4 over the 3l 4x4.
 

02RangerXLT

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
2,691
Reaction score
53
Points
0
Location
NE
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
thanks. so you guys recommend the 4l 4x4 over the 3l 4x4.
I honestly would, but it depends on what you're doing. Like I said, the 3.0 was good because of its fuel mileage around 60mph... but for me, I would rather have the power of the 4.0. Doing my 60mph driving, I get an average of 17mpg on a tank... but in the winter, it drops to about 11 or 12, even if I don't use 4wd that much. The 3.0 got about 15 in the winter. Its really a tossup... Power or fuel mileage? However, if you get a manual 4.0, I've seen people get an average of 20 with it, just because they are able to drive it well.

:icon_thumby:
 

dauphija#99

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
258
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Location
Chester,Nova Scotia
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3l 4 cyl
Transmission
Manual
well currently i have the 4cyl and its a dog on the hills. i would be using the truck for highway travel and the reason i want a bigger motor is for the hills and for doing some light duty towing, and the 4x4 is because of the big chances of traveling in the winter during storms. so I am thinking the 3l 4x4?
 

02RangerXLT

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
2,691
Reaction score
53
Points
0
Location
NE
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
well currently i have the 4cyl and its a dog on the hills. i would be using the truck for highway travel and the reason i want a bigger motor is for the hills and for doing some light duty towing, and the 4x4 is because of the big chances of traveling in the winter during storms. so I am thinking the 3l 4x4?
Well, either a 3.0 or 4.0 would work... if you get the 4.0m get a manual if you can, that will help mileage.. it would help the 3.0 too.

Either one should work fine, but if you daily drive it most of the time, get the 3.0.
 

02RangerXLT

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
2,691
Reaction score
53
Points
0
Location
NE
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
thanks 02rangerxlt its a big help
No problem, whatever you do end up getting you shouldn't be disappointed with the truck. Both engines are good, the 3.0 is about as bullet proof as a 5.9 cummins and the 4.0 is pretty good too.
 

bduke23

New Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2010
Messages
369
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Saskatoon, Sk
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Manual
If you do lots of commuting get the 3.0. I have a 3.0 4x4 with manual, and I get awesome mileage. I'm usually around 20,21 city and about 25,26 highway. Haven't had it through winter yet though, thats my summer mileage. As for power, I don't floor it ever, especially city driving, so a less powerful engine has never bothered me. As a bonus, if you want crazy reliability as already mentioned, you'll get it with the 3.0 :yahoo:
 

Original_Ranger84

Active Member
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
4,690
Reaction score
20
Points
38
Location
Homer, Ak/ Anchorage, AK/Fairbanks, AK
Vehicle Year
1984, 1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.8L, 3.0L
Transmission
Manual
Yeah I hardly notice a difference between my 3.0L and a 4.0L but that wasn't towing anything. they both had decent accel and what not. But I get an average of 18 in town and 20 - 25 highway give or take how fast I drive and stuff all with a manual and oversized tires.
 

bcost882

New Member
U.S. Military - Active
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
1,659
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
The Queens Country.....
Vehicle Year
2000, 2011
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.0L, 1.6L
Transmission
Manual
either you get you need a manual thats all im gunna say about that. it helps alot
 

JohnnyO

Moderator Emeritus
Supporting Member
Forum Staff - Retired
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 6, 2002
Messages
6,351
Reaction score
2,871
Points
113
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle Year
2020
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5"
Tire Size
265/70-17
My credo
"220, 221, whatever it takes."
The 3.0 came in around 96 or 97. I had a 99 3.0 4x4 Supercab, as mentioned above it was good on gas for a 4x4 but slow as molasses, and mine was a stick. After the 4.0 SOHC replaced the 4.0 OHV (in 01 I think) then the 3.0 was the only engine available in 4x4 Regular Cabs and the 4.0 SOHC was the only engine available in 4x4 Supercabs.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Members online

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Mudtruggy
May Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top