• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Staring at my Ranger


AutoRnD

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Messages
91
Reaction score
88
Points
18
Location
Vineland, New Jersey
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
Ford Ranger XLT
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
I'm here outside looking at my Ranger and I have these metal trims and apparently one is missing but I'm liking the look without them.

20231019_203348.jpg
20231019_203358.jpg
20231019_203341.jpg
20231019_203322.jpg


Is the trim stock or what this done by the previous owner?

What do you guys think?

Do you like the trim or not?
 


scotts90ranger

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
8,143
Reaction score
4,541
Points
113
Location
Dayton Oregon
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
They were aftermarket, someone added them. I'm not a flashy kind of guy, I put a chrome explorer grille on my '90, thought it matched the white better than the black so I'm ok with that but prefer more subtle tones... Looks like it shouldn't be too hard to remove with either a couple screws or a heat gun...
 

AutoRnD

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Messages
91
Reaction score
88
Points
18
Location
Vineland, New Jersey
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
Ford Ranger XLT
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
I put a chrome explorer grille on my '90, thought it matched the white better than the black so I'm ok with that
My main goal is black and chrome with that Ford blue for accents. I feel like this would be too much. I honestly don't like them. The truck is trashed but when simplified to the decent looking panels, the trim makes it look cheap.

Your truck looks great lifted. I like the white!

Thanks for the information!
 

scotts90ranger

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
8,143
Reaction score
4,541
Points
113
Location
Dayton Oregon
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
Thanks, I like the '90, I need to drive it more, hard to justify when gas is $4+ a gallon for regular when it needs plus or premium... yeah, it looks like it brings attention to the giant wheel openings the '93 up had... big part of why I went with a bigger tire on my '97...

20230728_195502.jpg
 

Josh B

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 15, 2019
Messages
4,005
Reaction score
1,988
Points
113
Location
Oklahoma
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
974
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
If it's 4x4 that gen, 31x10.5-15 seem to fit really nicely with no issues and they look right, not so much gap at the fenders but still plenty to work right.
Since 265/75R15 was an available option on 4x4 - and 31" is the same size, insignificantly larger cross section.
 

Josh B

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 15, 2019
Messages
4,005
Reaction score
1,988
Points
113
Location
Oklahoma
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Check the door label, it may well say 265/15
 

AutoRnD

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Messages
91
Reaction score
88
Points
18
Location
Vineland, New Jersey
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
Ford Ranger XLT
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Door says p225 70R14SL
 

Josh B

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 15, 2019
Messages
4,005
Reaction score
1,988
Points
113
Location
Oklahoma
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Wow, that kinda went the other way
 

scotts90ranger

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
8,143
Reaction score
4,541
Points
113
Location
Dayton Oregon
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
yeah, on the 4x2's they put tiny tires on... mine had the same size but I jumped to 225 70 15... 235 75 15 fit fine and looked better but I didn't like the cruising rpm in 5th gear, too much shifting on my commute.
 

Blmpkn

Toilet enthusiast
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
5,539
Reaction score
6,438
Points
113
Location
Southern maine
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ford Bronco
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5"
Tire Size
285/75/18
My credo
Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.
235/75/15 is just about the perfect size tire for a stock height 2wd IMO.. but like Scott said.. you'll be in and out of 5th quite a bit if you live pretty much anywhere but the Bible belt or Florida.

Wasn't a big deal to me.. 4cyls like to rev so it's not like 50-55 in 4th was hurting anything. Probably helped out efficiency slightly honestly.
 

AutoRnD

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2023
Messages
91
Reaction score
88
Points
18
Location
Vineland, New Jersey
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
Ford Ranger XLT
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Eventually I'd like it a bit lower that is if I can get the style wheels I want to fit. How would that effect the ride feel?
If not, Ill try to restore the stock wheels and see how it looks with larger tires.
 

RobbieD

2.9l Mafia
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
3,974
Reaction score
3,592
Points
113
Location
Georgia
Vehicle Year
1984,1990,1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
Toonces drives a Ranger . . . . just not very well.
If not, Ill try to restore the stock wheels and see how it looks with larger tires.
Your wheels are actually in pretty good condition. I don't see a lot of the "aluminum rot" that these wheels tend to get.

I honestly think it would be a good idea, on your part, to keep these wheels nice, or do a good restoration on them if it's needed.

They do look nice on your truck, and if you change wheels later you can always sell a nice set of OEM wheels and then put that money back into the truck. Good original parts for these trucks just keep getting scarcer.
 

scotts90ranger

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
8,143
Reaction score
4,541
Points
113
Location
Dayton Oregon
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
I actually was attempting to find some 15" deer hoof wheels but stumbled on what I got for $80 for the 4 with center caps and lug nuts... it took me several hours to strip then wet sand them to make them look decent (followed by a can of wheel clearcoat).

The problem with 14" wheels is the size you have is as tall as is available, they're relabeled 27" by something or other in some forms like all terrain or winter tires... the sizes available open up a lot in 15" which is why I went with that...

Correcting for the speedo difference tire size didn't make much of a change on mileage at all, with more aggressive winter or AT tires my '97 got 21-22mpg from 27-29" tall (225 70 14 through 235 75 15), once I switched to P tires it migrated to 23-25mpg consistently... I get bored so check most tanks of fuel, in the 60k miles the lowest I've seen is 19mpg towing and screwing around and highest around 25.5... mileage falls if you shift over 4k consistently, increases if you stop at 4k for hard acceleration and normal 3k... best cruising below 3k... a 3L will be similar but with an auto you have less choices...

If you mess with tire sizes too much look into what rear differential gearing you have as taller tires will make it more painful to drive (slow), lower gears (bigger numerical) will make it better, mine already has the lowest factory ratio of 4.10:1 so it's more forgiving than say my '90 was with 3.08 gears... For driveability doing a rear axle swap to change ratios is a good starter project, it's like 10-12 bolts, a brake line and parking brake cable... that was pretty much my first modification on the '90, factory ratio 3.08, got a $15 axle with 3.73's (back in the fordranger.com days, like '02), did a frame swap to 4x4 and got 4.10's then lifted and axle swapped to 5.13's...
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Members online

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Mudtruggy
May Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top