macx
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2011
- Messages
- 94
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
- Vehicle Year
- 1993
- Make / Model
- Ford
- Transmission
- Manual
Going to ohm my injectors, about 80k miles.
There's a possibility one or more of them aren't functioning quite right.
If I find I need one or more replacements, I've read that using the next
size larger injector (15 lb/hr versus the stock 14 lb/hr) can help power
in the mid and esp upper rpm ranges (just talking moderate street rpms
with a stock engine). That would be nice to have a little more torque
for pulling my bike trailer up hills on the highway. Not interested in
making big changes like going to 19's or anything, bigger cams/throttle
bodies, head work, etc. Am going to an electric fan, tho, as I've had
great success doing that on a couple other vehicles, altho with moderately
warmed up 5.8 small blocks. Better economy by about 1-1/2 mpg
the main improvement. I've got a spare small e fan I replaced with a
larger one on one of those rigs, and that spare would work great in the
Ranger. With only 100 hp stock, removing parasitic drag of even 3 to 5
hp couldn't hurt. Anyway, back to the injectors -
The article I read said to enlarge the hole in the mass air by a similar
% of cross section area - I've got experience with 5.0's and efi EEC-IV
.8's that have been modified, including larger mass air/injectors etc.
I'm not so sure about drilling out the mass air here. The 15 lb injectors
are only 7% larger flow than stock. One thing I do plan is to take a look
at the intake tube silencer and maybe remove it to allow more airflow.
Might that be enuf for just slightly larger injectors?
I know in 5.0's the stock computer will adapt and learn within a reasonable limit.
And that messing with the mass air airflow can mess it up and cause turbulence
which makes it worse instead of better.
Any experiences?
There's a possibility one or more of them aren't functioning quite right.
If I find I need one or more replacements, I've read that using the next
size larger injector (15 lb/hr versus the stock 14 lb/hr) can help power
in the mid and esp upper rpm ranges (just talking moderate street rpms
with a stock engine). That would be nice to have a little more torque
for pulling my bike trailer up hills on the highway. Not interested in
making big changes like going to 19's or anything, bigger cams/throttle
bodies, head work, etc. Am going to an electric fan, tho, as I've had
great success doing that on a couple other vehicles, altho with moderately
warmed up 5.8 small blocks. Better economy by about 1-1/2 mpg
the main improvement. I've got a spare small e fan I replaced with a
larger one on one of those rigs, and that spare would work great in the
Ranger. With only 100 hp stock, removing parasitic drag of even 3 to 5
hp couldn't hurt. Anyway, back to the injectors -
The article I read said to enlarge the hole in the mass air by a similar
% of cross section area - I've got experience with 5.0's and efi EEC-IV
.8's that have been modified, including larger mass air/injectors etc.
I'm not so sure about drilling out the mass air here. The 15 lb injectors
are only 7% larger flow than stock. One thing I do plan is to take a look
at the intake tube silencer and maybe remove it to allow more airflow.
Might that be enuf for just slightly larger injectors?
I know in 5.0's the stock computer will adapt and learn within a reasonable limit.
And that messing with the mass air airflow can mess it up and cause turbulence
which makes it worse instead of better.
Any experiences?
Last edited: