• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

engine swap info


Dav

Active Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2016
Messages
221
Reaction score
26
Points
28
Location
riverview, fl
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
ranger xlt
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
, 2.9
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
none but it is a convertible
Tire Size
stock
i'm looking for another series one ranger. this one will be a 4 banger. i have the 88 with the 2.9 auto. i want a gas sipping long distance voyager and that 2.9 ain't it!
if, and i stress that 'if' i can find a decent one, it will have the 4 plug motor. how much beer drinking/cussin' will be required to put a late 2.3 eng/trans in? i'm hoping that it will be a simple change eng/trans/wires to the brain and brain swap, not a 'gotta cut some here, where's the bfh? type swap.
i've only seen 4 plug motors at the junk yard and no 2.3 newer than 96 and none of them recently.
lastly, what is the last year of 2.3 production? am going to have to buy a'new' work truck at the auction. only need it for 2 years ('til i retire) so that will be the donor truck.
 


bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,502
Reaction score
4,699
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
tdi for max economy and awesome power.
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,363
Reaction score
8,375
Points
113
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
2.3l SOHC Lima engine was first used in 1974 Pinto and last used in a 1997 Ranger
4 Plug was last used in 1988 Ranger

2.3l DOHC Duratec engine was first used in a mid-2001 Ranger and used until 2011
2001-2003 had some issues and added parts not needed, but 2004 and requires you to used the instrument cluster along with "the brain", so lots of extra work

Yes, if MPG is the goal the diesel TDI would be the direction
 

Dav

Active Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2016
Messages
221
Reaction score
26
Points
28
Location
riverview, fl
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
ranger xlt
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
, 2.9
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
none but it is a convertible
Tire Size
stock
tdi stands for what? i hope it's not 'turbo' cause when turbos go they take the bank account with them, or so i hear.
a search here for tdi gave nothing.
okay, did some googling of tdi and am confused. 1.4 tdi from a fiesta? is a diesel that much more powerful than a gas motor that a 1.4 could replace a 2.3? or are you refering to something that i have yet to find on google?
 
Last edited:

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,502
Reaction score
4,699
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
Not necessarily. Actually these modern setups are quite robust.

When I say TDI I generally refer to the ALH or mechanical style Volkswagen 1.9 diesel.


Turbo. Direct injection.
 

Dav

Active Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2016
Messages
221
Reaction score
26
Points
28
Location
riverview, fl
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
ranger xlt
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
, 2.9
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
none but it is a convertible
Tire Size
stock
took a fast look at alh vw for info, then craigs list. wow! 15 year old cars are still going for big bucks! going to need much more info before getting into a project that big. i'm getting long in the tooth and will be on a fixed income soon so this will probably never happen
 

Uncle Gump

Token Old Guy
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Messages
14,075
Reaction score
13,647
Points
113
Location
Ottawa IL
Vehicle Year
2006/1986
Make / Model
Ranger/BroncoII
Engine Size
4.0L SOHC/2.9L
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Lead follow or get out of my way
A TDI swap is most likely in my future... not sure how distant that future is. I don't even have the Ranger yet... or maybe I do?

I think the adaptor is about $1300... so to budget swap a TDI into a Ranger... probably not going to happen.

In the end... a TDI swap it would be worth it. I'll just keep looking and when the parts can be had at the right price I will pick them up.

Good luck on whatever direction you go...
 

BlackBII

Ranger Custom
Article Contributor
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Truck of Month
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
7,899
Reaction score
984
Points
113
Location
UT
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
5
Tire Size
33
I have had both the 2.3 and 2.9, and I don't think the fuel savings will be worth swapping in the 2.3

The Lima 2.3 is supposed to get a combined 23mpg, but I never managed more than 20, which is about what my 2.9 was able to achieve.

The Duratec 2.3 on the other hand, would likely be able to get 25+
 

pjtoledo

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
5,439
Reaction score
3,051
Points
113
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle Year
20002005199
Make / Model
Fords
Engine Size
3.0 2.3
I have had both the 2.3 and 2.9, and I don't think the fuel savings will be worth swapping in the 2.3

The Lima 2.3 is supposed to get a combined 23mpg, but I never managed more than 20, which is about what my 2.9 was able to achieve.

The Duratec 2.3 on the other hand, would likely be able to get 25+
my 2005 2wd reg cab easily did 28 hwy and 23 combined. both with 400 lbs cargo at all times.
manual transmission, 3:73 gears.
the wrong tires can reduce mileage by 2-3 mpg.
 

PetroleumJunkie412

Official TRS EV Taunter
Supporting Member
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
7,826
Reaction score
6,565
Points
113
Location
Dirtman's Basement
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Size
2.9l Trinity
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Give 'yer balls a tug. Fight me.
i'm looking for another series one ranger. this one will be a 4 banger. i have the 88 with the 2.9 auto. i want a gas sipping long distance voyager and that 2.9 ain't it!
if, and i stress that 'if' i can find a decent one, it will have the 4 plug motor. how much beer drinking/cussin' will be required to put a late 2.3 eng/trans in? i'm hoping that it will be a simple change eng/trans/wires to the brain and brain swap, not a 'gotta cut some here, where's the bfh? type swap.
i've only seen 4 plug motors at the junk yard and no 2.3 newer than 96 and none of them recently.
lastly, what is the last year of 2.3 production? am going to have to buy a'new' work truck at the auction. only need it for 2 years ('til i retire) so that will be the donor truck.
Quickie 2.9 mpg build:

Bosch iridium plugs
PCV catch can
Remove and port your upper intake
Replace paper air filter with cotton gause style
Remove mechanical fan and replace with electric puller fan and thermostat
Brass cap and rotor
Resistor wires 8mm
Set timing to 11 deg BTDC
Synthetic lubricants with ZDDP additive
Remove and clean lower intake
Consider new injectors
Replace fuel pressure Regulator with newer one
Bosch O2 sensor
EPAS power steering conversion
Replace front and rear springs and have it aligned
MSD Blaster Coil
Seafoam at every oil change
Only use Exxon fuel.
Royal purple diff fluids
MT90 in the FM146 trans

That was my original build on my 2.9 before I realized I could buy superchargers for $30-120 at my local u pull it

I was getting 21-24 mpg in Hill territory in Pittsburgh PA
 

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,128
Reaction score
13,776
Points
113
Location
Jackson, NJ
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
my 2005 2wd reg cab easily did 28 hwy and 23 combined. both with 400 lbs cargo at all times.
manual transmission, 3:73 gears.
the wrong tires can reduce mileage by 2-3 mpg.
My '02 5spd 2.3l gets 28 average and it's abused everytime I drive it. It seems to like high rpm.
 

Dav

Active Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2016
Messages
221
Reaction score
26
Points
28
Location
riverview, fl
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
ranger xlt
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
, 2.9
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
none but it is a convertible
Tire Size
stock
because i have knee trouble, i can't use a standard anymore so i am stuck with the auto trans. used to love down shifting into corners.
what motor came between the lima sohc or '97 and the dohc of '01? and will a 2.3 with a 55e trans be worth looking into?
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,363
Reaction score
8,375
Points
113
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
Ford stroked the 2.3l SOHC Lima for 1998-2001.5

It was the 2.5l SOHC Lima, used from 1998-2000 and 1/2 the year in 2001, then in July 2001 Rangers got the 2.3l DOHC Duratec
 

Dav

Active Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2016
Messages
221
Reaction score
26
Points
28
Location
riverview, fl
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
ranger xlt
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
, 2.9
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
none but it is a convertible
Tire Size
stock
saturday morning is the auction. there are 12 rangers in it. 2 are 96's with 2.3. don't know about the rest yet.
if there is a 2.5, is it worth bidding on or are they a lemon? or were they just plain 'not so hot even if it's bigger' motors? i mean like they only made them for 2 years, right?
okay, went back to the auction site. only 4 are pre 05 and the other 2 are 3.0s. narrows it down a bit.
we'll see what happens.
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,363
Reaction score
8,375
Points
113
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
A 1995 to 1997 2.3l Lima will working in place of the 2.5l lima
1994 and earlier will not

The 2.5l was made from 1998 thru 2001 mid year, so 3.5 years
But its the same engine as the 2.3l Lima with a different crank and longer connecting Rods, a stroked 2.3l
Same head and pistons, just longer stroke
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Members online

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Mudtruggy
May Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top