• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

will a 2.3 work in place a 2.0


1988ttop

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2010
Messages
6
Transmission
Automatic
i have a 84 ranger as a dd she burns oil bad i cant find a 2.0 so would a 2.3 work
 
i have a 84 ranger as a dd she burns oil bad i cant find a 2.0 so would a 2.3 work

My dad and I successfully transplanted a 2.3L EFI engine into an '84 with a carb'ed 2.0L. Didn't last long tho, spun a bearing. Now it has a 5.0L!!:headbang: Would be beneficial to have a donor truck on hand too.
 
Did they ever make a carb'ed 2.3L? I can't recall.
 
Well, don't know about the carb, but the rest of it is possible.
 
would i be able to tkae the intake off the 2.0 and put it on the 2.3
 
so if i get one with a dissy on it i can just change the intake right ????
 
Looks like it.

Why don't you want EFI? J/W
 
Last edited:
dont want to spend the money i drive so i dont have to drive the f 150 or the stang
 
Ok, I can see that. It shouldn't take much longer to convert to EFI. I'd at least grab the parts if they are there and keep them around for a day when you can play with it. EFI should get you a few more MPG.
 
yes you can drop in a 2.3 in place of the 2.0..

yes there are carbed 2.3, look into 74-84(?) mustangs and rangers from 83-85
some, very few, 2.3 l were made with a round port head and ran a 1bbl carb, but most had the 2bbl progressive carb set up

you can use the 2.0 small round runner intake on the Dport head if you make or by an adapter plate (I have seen them on ebay) I made one out of 1/8 thick sheet aluim.

the 1BBL carb that the 2.0 has the intake will not cover/seal the lower outer corners on the 2.3l D port head

the exh sides of the heads are the same (look in the JY for a factory shorty headder)
 
yes you can drop in a 2.3 in place of the 2.0..

yes there are carbed 2.3, look into 74-84(?) mustangs and rangers from 83-85
some, very few, 2.3 l were made with a round port head and ran a 1bbl carb, but most had the 2bbl progressive carb set up

you can use the 2.0 small round runner intake on the Dport head if you make or by an adapter plate (I have seen them on ebay) I made one out of 1/8 thick sheet aluim.

the 1BBL carb that the 2.0 has the intake will not cover/seal the lower outer corners on the 2.3l D port head

the exh sides of the heads are the same (look in the JY for a factory shorty headder)

Actually as I recall 84-86 Mustang 2.3l were all 1bbl Carbs. The 2.3 started out in the Ford Pinto. I wouldnt waste my time putting a 2.0 intake on a 2.3. Just find a 2.3 and install it as is-you are better off that way.
The 2.0 and 2.3 are identical except bore size-but externally the bellhousings are the same as are motor mounts. I love 2.3s they are virtually bulletproof and Im in process of a 2.3 turbo swap into a 87 4x4 right now.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top