Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
Damn. That's...Nothing.put the truck on the dyno to see what the 4.0 ohv has to offer.
specs are 4.0 ohv stock with 100k miles. c4 transmission, 35" tires and 5.13 gears
before tune was about 83hp. after was 100hp/148tq
my buddy did his next
4.0 sohc stock. c4 trans 37" tires and 5.43 gears. after tune 184hp/202tq
a motor swap is in my future. not sure what though.
pretty damn pathetic. im pricing out a 3.7 swap from a guy down here who has been doing alot of em lately. if its less than a LS swap ill do it, if its similar in price then ill go for an LS with an overdrive trans.Damn. That's...Nothing.
Blower kit time. Or 4.6.
My votes at least. ??![]()
built c4? i would say they would fare better with a c4 then a m5od in this application. the tq converter is big in situations that the clutch would be screaming for a doubler.That's what a slushbox will do for ya.. Rob HP you can't afford to lose.
pretty damn pathetic. im pricing out a 3.7 swap from a guy down here who has been doing alot of em lately. if its less than a LS swap ill do it, if its similar in price then ill go for an LS with an overdrive trans.
theres also the thought to keep it simple and swap a 4.0 sohc in
The Boss!i am a huge fan of the cyclones....see them as the modern 302.
deep sand is a mutha.
built c4? i would say they would fare better with a c4 then a m5od in this application. the tq converter is big in situations that the clutch would be screaming for a doubler.
deep sand is a mutha.
i liken my 6.2 to a 4.0 for on road performance general driving....but it would be the opposite off road...where a manual trans would make it better.
yeah ive been doing some research on em and they seem like a very decent option. should be getting a price on the wiring harness and bellhousing adapter sometime this week.i am a huge fan of the cyclones....see them as the modern 302.