ben_2_go
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2007
- Messages
- 399
- City
- Third rock from sun
- Vehicle Year
- 2001
- Engine
- 2.5 (4 Cylinder)
- Transmission
- Automatic
- Tire Size
- 235-75-R15
- My credo
- None at all.
The victim's stats. 2001 Ranger XLT 2.5L Auto std. cab short bed. The SO bought it with 59,000 miles and one owner. I recently acquired said Ranger for my project.
I recently had a fuel pump failure. I removed the bed to clean out the tank, replace the sending unit, and replace the fuel filler hoses. After completing the work, I needed fuel to get the truck running and be able to make it to the fuel station two miles from my house. I bought 5.5 gallons of fresh fuel. After getting the 5.5 gallons of fuel in, I started the truck and allowed it to idle a few minutes to check for leaks. Then I headed off to the fuel station. I filled the tank completely with fuel. It held even 12 gallons of fuel on top of 5.5 gallons I filled it with before leaving home. That's 17.5 gallons of fuel. Let us ass-u-me I used a full gallon to get to the fuel station 2 miles away. That leaves me with 16.5 gallons of fuel in the tank when I filled up. I didn't cram fuel in until it puked out of the filler. I allowed the fuel pump to stop on its own. I was under the impression that this Ranger should have come from the factory with a 14-gallon tank. While I was working on replacing the sending unit, I found a factory sticker next to the fill port that had 2000 on it. Unfortunately, fuel washed the sticker away before I could get a pic of it. This leads me to believe that the tank isn't the original, or the manufacturer used a leftover 2000 extended cab tank. I think that may be the case because this Ranger is early 2001 with a 2.5L engine instead of the 2.3L Duratec. Does this seem plausible, or is this the wrong tank for this truck? I did have to modify the bracket and pump to shorten the assembly to fit in the tank. It was 1.25 inches too tall. I bought the right sending unit listed for my truck. The tank does seem a bit long for the size of the truck. If this is the correct tank for my truck, is there a larger tank that will fit in its place?
Yes, I posted this same topic on R-F.
I recently had a fuel pump failure. I removed the bed to clean out the tank, replace the sending unit, and replace the fuel filler hoses. After completing the work, I needed fuel to get the truck running and be able to make it to the fuel station two miles from my house. I bought 5.5 gallons of fresh fuel. After getting the 5.5 gallons of fuel in, I started the truck and allowed it to idle a few minutes to check for leaks. Then I headed off to the fuel station. I filled the tank completely with fuel. It held even 12 gallons of fuel on top of 5.5 gallons I filled it with before leaving home. That's 17.5 gallons of fuel. Let us ass-u-me I used a full gallon to get to the fuel station 2 miles away. That leaves me with 16.5 gallons of fuel in the tank when I filled up. I didn't cram fuel in until it puked out of the filler. I allowed the fuel pump to stop on its own. I was under the impression that this Ranger should have come from the factory with a 14-gallon tank. While I was working on replacing the sending unit, I found a factory sticker next to the fill port that had 2000 on it. Unfortunately, fuel washed the sticker away before I could get a pic of it. This leads me to believe that the tank isn't the original, or the manufacturer used a leftover 2000 extended cab tank. I think that may be the case because this Ranger is early 2001 with a 2.5L engine instead of the 2.3L Duratec. Does this seem plausible, or is this the wrong tank for this truck? I did have to modify the bracket and pump to shorten the assembly to fit in the tank. It was 1.25 inches too tall. I bought the right sending unit listed for my truck. The tank does seem a bit long for the size of the truck. If this is the correct tank for my truck, is there a larger tank that will fit in its place?
Yes, I posted this same topic on R-F.