Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
I was under the impression that the pumps were fairly interchangable between the two systems.
You are basing your worries on different platforms. Returnless systems from one vehicle to another are not the same. You will run into a point of driveability issues and making big power with the Ranger system.Kurt said:There are cars out there making a hell of a lot more power then my mild turbo ranger is with a return less system, so I am not worried about that aspect.
They don't list it for anything but Mustangs, T-birds and Crown Vic's.I don't think even Walbro will say the 255 is a replacement for the Ranger. I had to buy the one for the mustang, it's the same pump.
I am having a hard time finding a larger capacity replacement fuel pump for my 2000 ranger 2.5
This is a returnless system.
Anyone have any suggestions where I could find one?
The returnless system is technically not returnless, the regulator is in the tank on the fuel return from the fuel filter. It's a fixed pressure system though.
Hmm, I'll have to look closer at the wiring diagrams then, I was under the impression that the computer simply activated a relay like the older systems. If it actually controls volume/pressure by changing the voltage to the pump, the computer has to have some rather stout internals to shunt that much amperage. Or are they controling it by some other method that I don't know about?
What years are you talking about?
There is a fuel pressure transducer in the system too?
Hmm, much more complicated than I had at first thought.