Simple_serf
Well-Known Member
Like most 21 years olds, you think you are the smartest person on the planet, and know all there is to know about everything. There are many of us with years and years of experience that know a little bit about what we are talking about. Because no one will take you at your word, and see you as you see yourself, shows your immaturity. And, to wish those who disagree with you ill will, says something about your mental capabilities also. shady
Exactly.
You have not been able to prove that hotter spark=more power. Giving me dyno #'s doesn't count at all. The entire swap needs full documentation...I and, I would hope, you, know not to belive anyone's random HP #'s online. The engine in question has twin plugs which, following your logic would increase HP, although the engine is known to run the same HP without the extra coil pack. You ignored that this engine has OTHER ISSUES that prevent bolt ons from making more HP. The only thing that MAY help is the cam. You failed to address the expansion rate of the fuel, as well as why voltage is, in your mind, more important than heat generated, which is what I attempted to do when I compared 3 ignition types, all of which work, and I can prove that they work.
Don't you think that if automakers could get an extra 20 HP by putting a higher voltage coil in the car they would? Don't you think that if an aftermaket company like Onan could get an extra 5 KW out of a genset engine just by putting on a hotter coil, they would? (The limas were a popular 30KW genset engine). You forget that power OUT is directly proportional to the amount of power IN and that power IN is fuel, not spark, and that there comes a point (primarily limited by the fuel's expansion rate and the inherent inefficency of the internal combustion engine (which can't be changed unless you goto the Diesel cycle) ) where an engine is incapapble of making more power. The key is the expansion rate. Take a thin line of fuel along a sheet of metal. Light it. compute the time it takes to burn to the end. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Each time, the time is going to be the same, wether you light it with a match, an electric spark, or a electric hearing element (such as a rocket motor starter). This is due to the fact that the fuel has a set ignition point and a set expansion rate at ambient temp and pressure. I have done this test before, and when it warms up I will do it again.
You act as though all of us are idiots and that you are a genius and how you have more certifications and qualifications than 85% of the population (wow...that you actually belive that says alot). In other words, you claim you are smarter than approx 257,993,793 people (going on US Census Numbers).You have forgotten that just because you have a piece of paper doesn't mean that you actually know how to do the work, merely that you can pass a test. You let you ego and your pride get in the way of having a logical discussion. Your reputation Does NOT speak for itself, given that you are a newbie and we don't know your reputation at home.You forget that there are people on here with experience and knowlege that isn't limited to cars. That some of us have been around more than our share of internal combustion engines, in my case rare and unusual engines with many differnt types of ignition, carburation, and combustion chamber design.
If you want to have an actual converstation about theis stuff, I really suggest that you shut off the ego and the attitude and open your mind up to listen to what points other people bring up.