Well, learn something new everyday. I've always assumed that they were 4.6L based on the Continental. Still, they were a fun car to drive. IMHO better than the V6 Yamaha engine SHO.
The 3.4 SHO V8 was nice until it broke.
Though the engine has a MAJOR problem.
The cam sprockets are only located on the camshafts by FRICTION
(No KEY!!!)
And many of those engines when driven hard would slip time bending valves break pistons and basically destroy the engine.
In other words they used a flawed attachment "scheme" to hold the sprockets in place AND as an additional insult to injury did this on
an engine that was "non freewheeling"
if I understand someone else's description
The "fix" involved "tack" welding the cam to the sprockets
with the timing set correctly, then disassembling the enine and
TIG welding the prockets firmly to the cam.
I once had to make a "fix" to a twin cam saab engine where
the original design used a sintered metal cam sprocket
and the key could (and did) shear off the exhaust cam sprocket
bending all the exhaust valves...
My "fix" was done to a NEW sprocket after replacing the valves
I drilled a pilot hole through the sprocket and into the cam
then installed a solid steel PIN into an interference fit hole
in the driving face of the cam.
the sprocket was then mated to the cam with BOTH the
original cast-in "key" and a solid steel pin about 180degrees around the face of the sprocket.
And that pin wasn't going anywhere because it was actually
located UNDER the head of the bolt.
I'm not sure I;d go through all that ion a V8 taurus engine
because in that generation of taurus they never offered a manual trans
and the performance difference betwene the SHO3.4V8 and the optional twin cam 3.0 v8 wasn't that great anyway.
Frankly I've driven both and if I could choose I'd take a '94-95 Yamaha V6 powered SHO with a 5sp.
the onl better highway cruisers I've ever driven were (2nd place)
a 4.6SOHC t-bird ('94-95) or (1st place) a Lincoln Mk8.
AD