345 gears vs 373 gears

[mtnrgr]

Need assistance on these two gears for a stock 2wd ranger.

My 97 3.0 5spd ranger is 345 gears and single wheel peel with a 7.5 axle. For what it is now the 345 gears makes it scoot really good, yet I've read 373 gears will improve it all around. Will it really assist with fuel mileage, acceleration, climbing hills, etc? As mentioned the 345 does good with everything, yet im looking for more improvement. I'm looking to add a limited slip unit to there for traction from both tires. This ranger will stay stock, not building it as I did my 94 3.0 5spd ranger.

My 94 3.0 5spd had 31s with 410 gears with an auburn limited slip unit. Had those installed in 1999, and both were still in there when that truck was taken away from my hands last year. The truck had 90,000 miles when those were installed and it had 653,370 miles last summer..always used motorcraft 80w-90 with motorcraft friction modifier in the axle. Those units had roughly 530,000 and some miles on them and were still going strong.

Is there a major difference between 345 and 373 gears? If so what brand gears are good these days? For limited slip, I'm considering auburn again or what else is good for a limited slip unit?

Any and all assistance is appreciated.

 

[pjtoledo]

going by the math, it's about an 8% increase in torque.
any way you could borrow some 8% smaller tires for a trial run?

 

[lil_Blue_Ford]

3.45 may squeak out a little better highway economy.

My blue 00 Ranger was running 235/75-15 tires and 3.73 gears with a 3.0 and 5-speed. I was pretty happy with the setup but I also worked the truck a bit hauling. It would really scoot if you wound out the gears and let the 3.0 do its thing

 

[19Walt93]

If you're happy with the 3.45's, 3.73's would make a little difference on acceleration and climbing hills. I assume your area isn't hilly like NH, I test drove a new 04 Ranger 4x4 with a 3.0, 5 speed and 4.10's because I've never liked the 4.0 SOHC. After the test drive, I ordered a 4.0.

 

[bobbywalter]

i wouldnt dick with it unless it was under 180 bux installed.....maybe a 4.10 torsen equipped donor would be worth doing. they had one complete at holbrooks not long ago that was 800....thats 500 more that i would want to pay....but an easy couple hour swap for something worth doing ...

 

[cbxer55]

HAHA. I run 4.10s in my 98 3.0 auto, with low profile 14 inch tires Acceleration is great, still get to 100 with zero difficulty. Not that I feel the need to drive 100, it's against the law. And I really prefer the acceleration over top end. Tires are 205/70-14 on seven inch rims in the front, 245/60-14 on 8.5 rims in the back.

 

[bobbywalter]

HAHA. I run 4.10s in my 98 3.0 auto, with low profile 14 inch tires Acceleration is great, still get to 100 with zero difficulty. Not that I feel the need to drive 100, it's against the law. And I really prefer the acceleration over top end. Tires are 205/70-14 on seven inch rims in the front, 245/60-14 on 8.5 rims in the back.

the 3.0 is happier with the 410s.

 

[Snoranger]

I wouldn’t spend the money to go from 3.45s to 3.73s. 4.10s or 4.56s from 3.45s…. That’s worth it.

 

[mtnrgr]

Appreciate all the advice. My 94 3.0 5spd ranger had the 410s..that truck moved quite well. When that engine was stock it did good, thru the years when I had designed and built that engine the 410s made it much more fun to drive.

Since my 97 3.0 5spd ranger engine is stock, I've read the difference and in the past year of owning this truck and what I've done with it..I do believe I will stay with the 345 gears. Therefore I will just look into having a limited slip unit installed and be done with it.

Thanks for your help guys.

 

[85_Ranger4x4]

Not to complicate things but I would look for a axle with limited slip already. If it has 3.73 gears you kill two birds with one stone.

That is how I added limited slip to my Ranger. I just found a different axle for $100, rebuilt the clutches, resealed it and stuck it in.

 

[cbxer55]

the 3.0 is happier with the 410s.

That's a fact. With a full three inch intake tube, not the pinched stock tube, it is very rev happy.

 

[pjtoledo]

if you're in the mood to spend lots of money try this:

https://www.jegs.com/i/detroit-truetrac-363-912a316-detroit-truetrac-differential-ford-7-5?year=2005&make=ford&model=ranger&subModel=ranger&engine=v6-30l-182