• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

More Bronco hear say.


85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,342
Reaction score
17,837
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
Asking Bobby about how hard an engine swap is is about like asking Superman how hard it is to fly...

A coyote in a first Gen fits worse than a 460. IMO same as not fitting.

Wait for a 7.3 if you must, they are a hair bigger than a 351W.
 


wildbill23c

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ham Radio Operator
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
3,917
Reaction score
577
Points
113
Location
Southwestern Idaho
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
0
Total Drop
0
Tire Size
215/70-R14
My credo
19K, 19D, 92Y, 88M, 91F....OIF-III (2004-2005)
Asking Bobby about how hard an engine swap is is about like asking Superman how hard it is to fly...

A coyote in a first Gen fits worse than a 460. IMO same as not fitting.

Wait for a 7.3 if you must, they are a hair bigger than a 351W.
The new Coyotes are that much larger than the old 302's? I guess most likely they would be with all the stuff that's added on top of them for fuel injection, wiring harnesses, etc. I didn't think a 460 would ever fit in an RBV anyways, I've heard of a few do a 351 swap and had to do quite a bit to get them to fit then had worse overheating issues than the old 302 swaps LOL.

That new Coyote engine in a new Bronco would be awesome though. Or in a new Ranger.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,342
Reaction score
17,837
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
Massively huger... and weighs about the same.

Screenshot_20210207-154939_Samsung Internet.jpg
 

fastpakr

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
U.S. Military - Veteran
V8 Engine Swap
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,018
Reaction score
2,833
Points
113
Location
Roanoke, VA
Vehicle Year
1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
285/75-16
Asking Bobby about how hard an engine swap is is about like asking Superman how hard it is to fly...

A coyote in a first Gen fits worse than a 460. IMO same as not fitting.

Wait for a 7.3 if you must, they are a hair bigger than a 351W.
I was thinking the same thing. The hard and fast rules the rest of us live by are a lot more flexible when Bobby designs an engine swap. And it's a beautiful thing.
 

Roert42

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
4,777
Reaction score
4,961
Points
113
Location
Kintersville, PA
Vehicle Year
2011
Make / Model
Ranger XLT
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
I belive ford is selling crate 7.3s, but they do not have a stand alone wiring harness yet, like the coyote.
 
Last edited:

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,668
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
Asking Bobby about how hard an engine swap is is about like asking Superman how hard it is to fly...

A coyote in a first Gen fits worse than a 460. IMO same as not fitting.

Wait for a 7.3 if you must, they are a hair bigger than a 351W.


That's fair to a point ... But the packaging of it is better then the romeo.


Steering issues are there.
go over rail with steering gear on the older trucks .. for more clearance hybrid the column and room is there in spades

Remote the hvac in any case...that sux. But doable for garage build.

have to add joints on the newer trucks ...but steering can be easier

Log headers




There are already guys stepping up to do coyote swaps in this bronco platform right off the dealer lot.

That will tie into the next generation ranger nicely.



I am stuck on the 4 whizzer ecoboost for my b2...but lil bob is growing up and pushing for something that makes proper sounds.

My wife is raining on my new bronco parade with the Tahoe....so it will be interesting to see what I get stuck with.
 

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,668
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
I belive ford is selling crate 7.3s, but they do not have a stand alone wiring harness yet, like the coyote.
The holley runs it fine.

Watson and holbrook have several running builds.

Dyno Tech at Ford verified it's fitable in the ranger....well...cut outs. Lives a few houses down.
 

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,668
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
6.5vs350.jpg
Screenshot_20210207-154939_Samsung Internet.jpg
302-vs-305-chevy-intro-baseline-1.jpg



That's my engine vs a 350....mod motor vs 302.....and a 350 vs 302.


when you line these up from crank centerline position the space that the mod uses up most is available in the rangers... re-indexing pedal location for brake booster or going hydroboost will depend on application.....2wd low rider to sas trail brute on 40's...


the 6.8 liter version of godzilla and induction/direct injection scheme will be a much better fit in these broncos.... with electric versions and hybrids of EVERYTHING ford makes on the table....from an emissions perspective....going to be some interesting potential out of these broncos.


i suspect electrics to go after postal and delivery markets...
 
Last edited:

wildbill23c

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ham Radio Operator
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
3,917
Reaction score
577
Points
113
Location
Southwestern Idaho
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
0
Total Drop
0
Tire Size
215/70-R14
My credo
19K, 19D, 92Y, 88M, 91F....OIF-III (2004-2005)

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,668
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
Well crap guess that throws out the Coyote in the Bronco 2 or Ranger then LOL. I didn't realize the Coyote was that damn wide.
no..... we just said it fits fine. that fat bastard diesel looks cozy in my rig and it is a gen 1
 

Roert42

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
4,777
Reaction score
4,961
Points
113
Location
Kintersville, PA
Vehicle Year
2011
Make / Model
Ranger XLT
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Well crap guess that throws out the Coyote in the Bronco 2 or Ranger then LOL. I didn't realize the Coyote was that damn wide.

OHC = why does such a small engine take up so much space?
 

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,668
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"





you guys are crazy....
 

Roert42

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
4,777
Reaction score
4,961
Points
113
Location
Kintersville, PA
Vehicle Year
2011
Make / Model
Ranger XLT
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
That intake tube is kinda small looking.

Now I want to see you put a 300 in it.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,342
Reaction score
17,837
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
The 2v 5.4 in my F150 feels more like an engine swap than the 302 in my Ranger.

Only one cam per engine in my Ranger thank ya very much...

Also why we went 2.3 on the Bronco...
 
Last edited:

wildbill23c

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ham Radio Operator
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
3,917
Reaction score
577
Points
113
Location
Southwestern Idaho
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
0
Total Drop
0
Tire Size
215/70-R14
My credo
19K, 19D, 92Y, 88M, 91F....OIF-III (2004-2005)





you guys are crazy....
That is a really nice looking Bronco 2, and it sounds great too. Ok, so Coyote or 5.4L Triton at some point in a Ranger or Bronco 2 is added to my bucket list LOL.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top