• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

3.0 vs 4.0


Hawker

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Points
0
This has probably been discussed a lot, but I'm not finding anything so I'll just ask.
Have a perfect 02 XLT extended cab with the 3.0 auto. Love it but sometimes wish for a little more umph. They still make the 4.0 in a 4X2 but I'd have to order one since they're rare. Just wondering if it's worth the effort as I'm not sure what else I'd be getting to justify the expense and is there that much performance improvement?
 


Will

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
Joined
Nov 30, 2001
Messages
6,924
Reaction score
514
Points
113
Location
Gnaw Bone, Indiana
Vehicle Year
2007
Make / Model
Toyota
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
There's probably 2 seconds 0-60 improvement with an overhead cam 4.0. It would definately provide you with the extra umph. Whether it's worth it, I don't know. More than likely you will suffer for your sins at the pump.
 

Bill

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
1,062
Reaction score
898
Points
113
Location
Sacramento, CA
Vehicle Year
2007
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
The difference in fuel economy between the two is small. Small enough that if you want the extra power, it warrants buying a 4.0L.
 

stegomon

Active Member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
2,177
Reaction score
20
Points
38
Age
39
Location
auburn/minot maine
Vehicle Year
1987/1990
Make / Model
fords and only
Transmission
Manual
4.0 is more torqu at lower rpm range...were as the 3.0 is a car motor the 4.0 is a truck motor
 

ZMan

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
MTOTM Winner
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
3,778
Reaction score
406
Points
83
Age
38
Location
Medina, Ohio
Vehicle Year
1992,1994
Make / Model
Ford Rangers
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
4/4, bagged
The difference in fuel economy between the two is small. Small enough that if you want the extra power, it warrants buying a 4.0L.
2-5mpg in my experiance, it can add up. But we are talking 40-50hp/tq here so I think I would just go for the 4.0l anyway.
 

Ranger44

New Member
Ford Technician
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
3,127
Reaction score
23
Points
0
Location
Illinois
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
FORD
Engine Size
4.0 OHV
Transmission
Automatic
The 3.0 gets way better gas mileage than the 4.0. It will get 23-24 with a 5spd. If you really want more power get the 4.0 but if you like reliability over power stick with the 3.0 and swap in some 4.10 gearing for some extra get up.
 
Last edited:

Jspafford

Logan Andrew Feb 17, 2012
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Jan 2, 2001
Messages
8,012
Reaction score
15
Points
38
Age
40
Location
Lancaster, Ohio
Vehicle Year
2016
Make / Model
Chevy 3500HD
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
6.6L
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
5"
Tire Size
35"
The 3.0L I currently have gets worse mileage than my 4.0L did.

My old 4.0L would kick the shit out of the 3.0, but the 3.0L is no slouch. It seems pretty peppy until it hits 2nd gear. That is with 4.10's.

If I was going to do it all over again, I would have not traded in my 2001 4.0L ranger on my F-250, had I known I would be buying my Fiancee' a ranger.
 

Ranger44

New Member
Ford Technician
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
3,127
Reaction score
23
Points
0
Location
Illinois
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
FORD
Engine Size
4.0 OHV
Transmission
Automatic
A 5spd makes a difference... in both being peppy and gas milelage. The 3.0 is a high rever and needs to be at higher rpms to achieve both. No overdrive.
 

RedRanger

New Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Hickory, NC
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
I have a 2001 Ranger 3.0L with a 5 speed and it dosent have alote of power but with a trac lock and a 4.10 ring gear I can bark 3rd gear and beat just about any 3.8L stock mustang in Hickory. But ive never ran up against any other Ranger with a 4.0L :sad:
 

Will

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
Joined
Nov 30, 2001
Messages
6,924
Reaction score
514
Points
113
Location
Gnaw Bone, Indiana
Vehicle Year
2007
Make / Model
Toyota
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
The difference in fuel economy between the two is small. Small enough that if you want the extra power, it warrants buying a 4.0L.
Well, it's the same truck, so it should take the same power to accelerate it at the same rate and hold it at the same speed. But when you want more power, that means you are going to use it and you will get worse mileage if you use it.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,342
Reaction score
17,833
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
Well, it's the same truck, so it should take the same power to accelerate it at the same rate and hold it at the same speed. But when you want more power, that means you are going to use it and you will get worse mileage if you use it.
My '02 5.4 supercab gets better milage than my brothers '97 4.6 regular cab. Mainly because it has enough ponys to power thru hills as opposed to downshifting alot and multiple times on the same hill, which seems to be a common thing with the smaller engine options, they have the power but have to wind up to find it which takes gas in itself. He even has 3.55 gears with the stock 255 tires, as opposed to mine with 3.31's and 235's replaced with 255's.
 

2manyfords

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
243
Reaction score
3
Points
18
Age
57
Location
Brandon Manitoba Canada
Vehicle Year
1992
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
No question about it, the 4.0L is harder on fuel but the 3.0L is lazy.

My dad's '06 Ranger has a 3.0L and it won't even come close to the 2.9L that his old truck has
 

JohnnyO

Moderator Emeritus
Supporting Member
Forum Staff - Retired
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 6, 2002
Messages
6,330
Reaction score
2,840
Points
113
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle Year
2020
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5"
Tire Size
265/70-17
My credo
"220, 221, whatever it takes."
I agree with Bill. I've had a 3.0/stick and two 4.0/autos, all 4x4's.
3.0 was slow and good on gas.
4.0 had a bunch of power and hard on gas.
I've rented several 3.0/autos from Budget back when they'd rent Rangers for cheap and I didn't think they were any better on gas than my 4.0, at least on the highway. City mpg may have been a little better.
 

ZMan

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
MTOTM Winner
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
3,778
Reaction score
406
Points
83
Age
38
Location
Medina, Ohio
Vehicle Year
1992,1994
Make / Model
Ford Rangers
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
4/4, bagged
every truck is different and everyone drives different is what it comes down to.

Best I've gotten with my 2wd 5 spd 4.0l is about 21 cruising 65 back when I had the 3.08 gears, I can't break 20 now with 3.73s, one time I let my friend drive to give myself a rest, he couldn't muster better than 17mpg, on the HIGHWAY. BTW thats the difference between 65 and 75 for my truck on the highway with the 3.73s, 2-3 fawkin miles per gallon.

My 2wd 3.0l 5spd gets 21-22 with my mix country road and city driving, and 25 cruising 65mph. When my friend (same one as before) owned it with the auto tranny, he could barely break 22 on the highway. Honestly I think the power is fine, it cruises at 80mph perfectly, and is 10x better than driving a 4cyl.

Some people just have no idea HOW to get good mileage. I've tried to explain to my friend a million times why he can't get good mileage out of vehicles but he still keeps driving stupid.
 

Will

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
Joined
Nov 30, 2001
Messages
6,924
Reaction score
514
Points
113
Location
Gnaw Bone, Indiana
Vehicle Year
2007
Make / Model
Toyota
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
Yeah, I drove out to Washington D.C. once with my younger brother in my Mazda B2600i to pick up a marine engine. We took turns at the wheel. The truck didn't have cruise control. I made 26mpg on my turns and he made 31mpg on his. He drives a lot more smoothly than I do I guess. With a little engine I think you have to be more steady because if you slow down you really have to get into the pedal more to get back up to speed.

The thing about having to downshift is very true. While a truck should getter better mileage near it's torque peak, it's not making peak torque unless you have it at that particular rpm with the pedal to the floor and it isn't accelerating any more. Any lower torque setting (part throttle cruise) and I believe the lower rpms mean less fristion and the other factors mean less. This theory is born out by poring through the EPA's website and looking at the year before and the year after overdrive showed up. That's 1981-82 depending on the vehicle. Overdrive adds maybe 15%--so anytime you pop out, you are losing that benefit. If you have a wiffle engine that has run run wide open to pull a hill, then it isn't as important.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Members online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top