• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

roller rockers, how do they affect torque?


pjtoledo

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
5,414
Reaction score
3,003
Points
113
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle Year
20002005199
Make / Model
Fords
Engine Size
3.0 2.3
2000 4x4 3.0 ATX.
I'm getting ideas about the 1.7 ratio roller rockers. anybody know how they affect the torque curve? since they basically emulate a bigger cam I would suspect they reduce the bottom end and move the peak torque to a higher RPM.
currently the gears are 3.73, its turning about 2500 RPM at 70 Mph. 4.10s are in the works, that would put the hi-way RPMs at about 2750.

torque improvement below 3000 is my goal, so do you think the 1.7s in combination with head porting would help or hurt?

also thinking of an intake spacer to make the runners longer.
 


55trucker

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
602
Reaction score
183
Points
43
Location
Oshawa, Ontario
Vehicle Year
1998
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
-
Total Drop
mild
The 1.7's won't necessarily move the torque curve up, they may actually lower the rpm curve where it begins to peak (which would be good ..where this anemic engine is concerned).

The 1.7's will not increase the duration at all, the cam profile opens & closes the valves, so if the cam profile doesn't change neither will the duration. What Will change is the speed at which the valve moves, the 1.7 rocker will cause the valve to open & close faster thru the duration that the valve is off the seat as well as extend the valve deeper into the combustion chamber. That should allow more air into the cylinders increasing the torque (marginally), remembering that the PCM controls the A/F ratio.

I've considered this move as well, but have just never got around to actually doing it.
 
Last edited:

gw33gp

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Ham Radio Operator
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
1,739
Reaction score
540
Points
113
Location
Costa Mesa, CA
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
33"
I don't know how much the 1.7 ratio rockers will effect torque. My guess is it will basically improve high rpm horse power. I don't know what the stock ratio is but am guessing 1.7 is a higher ratio than stock and will open the valves a little more to get more air flow. It will also open and close the valves quicker which provides a little more flow. All of this should provide more horse power at higher rpm and may shift the peek torque but I would not count on it.
Head porting can help or hurt engine performance depending on how it is ported. Porting is a real science. I have been building my race engines since 1986 but I leave the head porting to an expert. I have seen race engines ruined by bad porting.
Just remember engine performance is optimized by tuning everything. Just working in one area may provide some improvement but overall tuning makes a huge difference. Sometimes changing one thing can upset the balance and give you negative results.
 

stmitch

March 2011 STOTM Winner
MTOTM Winner
2011 Truck of The Year
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
2,287
Reaction score
650
Points
113
Location
Central Indiana
Vehicle Year
2000
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Manual
I'd expect the rockers to increase tq throughout the rev range.

This article ( http://www.hotrod.com/articles/roller-rocker-ratio-test/ )involves a small block chevy doing dyno runs with various rocker arms. They saw an increase in hp and tq at the 3 listed engine speeds just from switching from stamped rockers to roller tips of the same ratio. Increasing the ratio had a similar effect. Pay special attention to the chart that compares the various runs.

As for porting, you'll probably find that there is plenty of material in the heads, and especially the lower intake manifold that can be removed if you so choose. They're rough castings. Even if you don't open them up very much, I think that removing some of the roughness and mold marks will only help you out. Mine are gasket matched, and smoothed throughout the runner. I removed a decent amount of material, but they could be taken quite a bit further too. My focus was trying to eliminate obstructions to flow as much as I could, rather than massively reshaping the runners/bowls.

If you're taking the heads apart, I'd also suggest polishing the combustion chambers to reduce detonation that the 3.0 is so well known for. It might reduce your compression ratio a touch, but it will keep it from pinging and cutting spark when you try to accelerate. Milling the heads can always restore your compression ratio.
Here are mine before/after:






 
Last edited:

pjtoledo

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
5,414
Reaction score
3,003
Points
113
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle Year
20002005199
Make / Model
Fords
Engine Size
3.0 2.3
my biggest concern would be scavenging and overlap. if the exhaust is held open too long it may kill the temporary vacuum in the exhaust runners that gets the intake moving sooner when both valves are open. true the timing events are the same, but the valves being open further late in the cycle may allow the exhaust gases back into the cylinder rather than seal them out.
I'm thinking some long narrow headers may increase the velocity so the exhaust can't do reversion as fast.

for the intake I'm going to take a cue from my Taurus SHO. they use a large surge tank as a pressure reservoir that feeds long intake runners. the tank gets the air moving sooner, the long runners cram more into the cylinder.

wanting better low rpm power, I'll try spacers to lengthen the intake runners.
the surge tank shouldn't be too hard to fab.


let the bench engineering begin!
 

55trucker

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
602
Reaction score
183
Points
43
Location
Oshawa, Ontario
Vehicle Year
1998
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
-
Total Drop
mild
if the exhaust is held open too long it may kill the temporary vacuum in the exhaust runners that gets the intake moving sooner when both valves are open. true the timing events are the same, but the valves being open further late in the cycle may allow the exhaust gases back into the cylinder rather than seal them out.

There is no change at all in the amount of time that either valve is off the seat, all the larger ratio rocker does is cause the valves to move faster & to open deeper into the combustion chamber. The valves open & close at the same position of either the upramp & downramp of each cam lobe regardless of what rocker is used.
 
Last edited:

Rustbucket350

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2016
Messages
140
Reaction score
32
Points
28
Vehicle Year
1986
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
They shouldn't affect overlap at all. They'll just open the valves further for the same amount of time. The power gain would depend on how the head flows at the new lift vs the old lift. Adding lift might actually hurt performance if you open the valves farther than the lift at the peak head flow. To really see a difference you'd want a cam with more duration and a tighter lobe angle.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Mudtruggy
May Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top