• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Explorer D35 in a BII with D28


92fordzilla

New Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Burlington, Ontario
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9L V6
Transmission
Manual
Just wondering is this a direct bolt in or do I need a D35 out of a 90 BII. Or will a D35 out of a 1992 Ranger fit in.


The BII is a 1989

The Exploder is a 1993
 


adsm08

Senior Master Grease Monkey
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
34,623
Reaction score
3,613
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
Don't see why It wouldn't be. Most of the D-35 donors are Explorers.
 

Shran

Junk Collector
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
Solid Axle Swap
Truck of Month
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
8,701
Reaction score
4,802
Points
113
Location
Rapid City SD
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Driveline length is the only issue you may have. Otherwise 100% bolt in.
 

92fordzilla

New Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Burlington, Ontario
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9L V6
Transmission
Manual
Thats what I was thinking. Driveshaft lengths are no problem I can get them shortened at a local shop.
 

twoll86

Member
U.S. Military - Active
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
383
Reaction score
9
Points
18
Age
38
Location
caseyville,il
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
yes yes and yes
i took a dana 35 out of an xploder and put in my b2 i had then took it back out and put it in my explorer cause it have 4.88s and a locker
 

mjonesjr

I dance with the Devil...
Firefighter
Forum Staff - Retired
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
4,967
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Age
39
Location
Salem, IN
Transmission
Automatic
The only problem you will have is the front drive shaft if you don't swap in a BW1354 transfer case. If you swap in a BW1354 transfer case, then you can use the Explorer front drive shaft without any problems.
 

twoll86

Member
U.S. Military - Active
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
383
Reaction score
9
Points
18
Age
38
Location
caseyville,il
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
mjonesjr has a good point i dint think of that cause i already had that transfercase
 

92fordzilla

New Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Burlington, Ontario
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9L V6
Transmission
Manual
Thats no problem was going to swap the t-case out with it all probably anyways.



Next though does anyone know if a D35 out of a 92 ranger would fit or is it a different width.


Only reason I am not sure is that I took the axles out of my ranger and the rear 8.8 axle is a couple inches narrower than the Bronco II (with the 7.5 or what ever it is) and my explorer with the 8.8 looks to be a little wider than the BII's. So I am not sure but the front should be close to the same width as rear to keep tires all in line on same track.

Wider is no issue that would help lessen the roll over potential anyways


Thanks James
 
Last edited:

Shran

Junk Collector
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
Solid Axle Swap
Truck of Month
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
8,701
Reaction score
4,802
Points
113
Location
Rapid City SD
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
I am pretty sure they're the same width or damn near, within maybe an inch. The Explorer 8.8s are wider though.
 

twoll86

Member
U.S. Military - Active
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
383
Reaction score
9
Points
18
Age
38
Location
caseyville,il
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
same axle between b2 and rangers and for the 35 they are the same between b2 X's and rangers

but if you can find a 95-97 ranger 2 pull the 35 from you will get better brakes as they have dual piston calipers and removable caliper brackets(fyi)
 

trail B2

New Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
1,289
Reaction score
8
Points
0
Location
North Eastern Ca.
Vehicle Year
1986
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
My left side is a 35 off of a 93 Ranger.My right side is off a 92 explorer hopefully there the same.
 

RacinNdrummin

Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
629
Reaction score
7
Points
18
Location
Auburn, Wa
Vehicle Year
2005
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Manual
The explorer D35 is a different width than the B2 or Ranger D35.

My B2 came with a D35 and it was even with the fenders. Now I have a D35 from an explorer and my tires stick out. The explorer D35 is the same track width as the explorer 8.8.
 

AllanD

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 1, 2001
Messages
7,897
Reaction score
134
Points
63
Age
62
Location
East-Central Pennsylvania
Vehicle Year
1987... sorta
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
'93 4.0
Transmission
Manual
The explorer D35 is a different width than the B2 or Ranger D35.

My B2 came with a D35 and it was even with the fenders. Now I have a D35 from an explorer and my tires stick out. The explorer D35 is the same track width as the explorer 8.8.


There is some other reason, because the axle beams and knuckles are exactly the same...


track width of the front relative to the rear axle is a seperate issue
it's completely normal (but stupid from a design standpoint)

The '83-92 ranger rear was narrower than any front axle.

The 1993-up ranger axle is 2" wider

The D35 is wider than the D28.

AD

AD
 

RacinNdrummin

Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
629
Reaction score
7
Points
18
Location
Auburn, Wa
Vehicle Year
2005
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Manual
Stock drop brackets, the rest is explorer...

The front end is a good 1.5" wider on each side than the rear. With the stock D35, it was even front to back.

All im saying is the frontend is wider than it was and the only difference in my setup is the TTB from an explorer.
 
Last edited:

4x4junkie

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
10,757
Reaction score
583
Points
113
Location
So. Calif (SFV)
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
Bronco II
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
2.9L V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
35x12.50R15
Must've been a D28 before, which is narrower.

All D35s are the same width regardless of the vehicle it comes from.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Members online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top