- Joined
- Mar 18, 2008
- Messages
- 336
- City
- NW Montana
- Vehicle Year
- 1985,1986(2),19
- Transmission
- Automatic
Yup, that's all there is to them. They are still worlds better than the stock stuff. Worth every penny to me.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
how much that run u?
im trying to figure out what makes my tires go like this / \ when i park with the wheels turned
wouldnt it work better to have a solid tie rod(no pivots in the middle) and have sort of a short draglink to connect to that and the pitman arm?
im trying to figure out what makes my tires go like this / \ when i park with the wheels turned
If the ackerman angle is a little off (and it usually is), it can cause a small amount of jacking of the suspension while the wheels are turned. Nothing really to worry about. It's also possible you're just seeing the tires leaning due to the caster angle, which is only apparent when turned sharp.
I was under the impression that Ackerman is built into the knuckle. I was told that is why it's best to get an axle/s from a vehicle as close to the same length as your original axle/s. Is this true?I'm sure the Stonecrusher steering with it's longer links would reduce that to some extent by improving the ackerman at the wheels.
Another thing that helps is moving the front axle forward through shimming of the radius arm bushings. This changes the steering linkage geometry in relation to the knuckles in such a way as to improve the ackerman somewhat as well.
Again, it's not something all that detrimental though unless maybe you're doing a delivery service where you'd be making a lot of u-turns and what not.
I was under the impression that Ackerman is built into the knuckle. I was told that is why it's best to get an axle/s from a vehicle as close to the same length as your original axle/s. Is this true?
Thanks,
Richard