- Joined
- Feb 28, 2001
- Messages
- 9,504
- City
- Dayton Oregon
- Vehicle Year
- 1990, 1997
- Engine
- 2.3 (4 Cylinder)
- Transmission
- Manual
- Total Lift
- 6
- Tire Size
- 35"
I agree with that also, the most reliable and efficient mine was was when it was stock, maxxed out at 29mpg, averaged 25... it went down from there, 23mpg with the 235's, 19mpg with the 31's (it has alignment issues that aren't helping), and somewhere around 14 with the turbo... (did I mention hearing the turbo spool up is addicting?)
use the engine to it's potential and it has enough power to get a stock ranger around just fine, if you don't have a tach, they're nice to have, the stock gage cluster is a bolt in, find yourself a '89-91 ranger or bronco II and just swap it in, you can keep your stock speedometer...
use the engine to it's potential and it has enough power to get a stock ranger around just fine, if you don't have a tach, they're nice to have, the stock gage cluster is a bolt in, find yourself a '89-91 ranger or bronco II and just swap it in, you can keep your stock speedometer...