Did you install the plate from the '86? Any year 2.8 or 2.9 will work. The little bolts in the bottom won't line up which could give you a little noise from time to time but, the starter will work fine.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
Did you install the plate from the '86? Any year 2.8 or 2.9 will work. The little bolts in the bottom won't line up which could give you a little noise from time to time but, the starter will work fine.
you could put the torque convertor on backwards and it wouldnt make a difference. it bolts on behind the flexplate.
i saw the picture of the damage to your flexplate and it looks minimal.
this problem is really perplexing. im wondering if there is a way to get the flex plate on backwards. im going to go out to the garage and look at the flexplate I have laying on the floor.
Im with mutant pony now. I think the seperator plate holds the starter close to the flexplate. I think there is too much slop without the plate and the starter is too far away from the flexplate.
I saw that there is no way the flexplate can be placed on backwards.
no man, the seperator plate has a hole cut out that the starter fits in to. I have a suspicion that the..
Ill put it this way. imagine that you have the starter on and the bolts in finger tight but not tight. the holes in the starter are sloppy and the starter may be allowed to move around. it may not be pressed close enough to the flexplate to allow the starter teeth to engae the flexplate teeth. get under your car and try it. i bet with the bolts finger tight you can still move the starter left and right and up and down.
do you see what im saying? the shim effect of the seperator plate isnt the issue, its locating the starter close to the teeth on the flexplate