fredobandito
Member
About three weeks ago, my Ranger finally hit 95,000 miles, so I decided to go ahead and do a tune-up during my regularly scheduled oil change. I went over to Advance and bought the Autolite wire set and the Motorcraft SP-500s that were listed as the standard service plug. Installation was mostly uneventful.
Yesterday I filled up the tank after the first full run on the new plugs, and during my normal mileage calculation, I noticed that my mileage dropped almost 2mpg on the new plugs compared to my worn-out old plugs (16mpg down to 14mpg) under the same driving conditions.
I started doing some investigating, and I noticed that the Motorcraft part number on my old plugs was different than my new plugs. Interchanging to the parts store stock number came up with an SP-432, which is a double platinum plug specified in the Taurus variant of the Vulcan, whereas the SP-500 is a finewire single platinum plug. Both interchange with an Autolite 104 series plug and list the SP-413 nickel plug as the alternate service plug, and side-by-side visual comparison shows that the SP-500 has a slightly longer threaded portion than the SP-432, but not significantly so.
Thinking it was a goof in the Advance catalog (which happens periodically to supplier changes brought about by the CARQUEST buyout), I checked AutoZone, Rock Auto, and the Ford parts site. All of them list the SP-500.
I've heard of Ford superseding part numbers before, but in this age of increasingly strict emission standards, I have a hard time believing that they'd step down to a less efficient plug. I bought the truck used in 2010 with about 40k miles on it, so it wouldn't be illogical to assume that the plugs that I pulled out of it are the factory-equipped plugs. Then again, I know a guy with an '85 Grand Marquis with a 302 who feels compelled to replace plugs and wires on it every 5,000 miles.
Is it uncommon for Vulcan Rangers to be equipped with double platinum plugs?
Part numbers:
Motorcraft double platinum: AGSF32FM/SP-432
Motorcraft finewire platinum: AGSF22FM/SP-500
Yesterday I filled up the tank after the first full run on the new plugs, and during my normal mileage calculation, I noticed that my mileage dropped almost 2mpg on the new plugs compared to my worn-out old plugs (16mpg down to 14mpg) under the same driving conditions.
I started doing some investigating, and I noticed that the Motorcraft part number on my old plugs was different than my new plugs. Interchanging to the parts store stock number came up with an SP-432, which is a double platinum plug specified in the Taurus variant of the Vulcan, whereas the SP-500 is a finewire single platinum plug. Both interchange with an Autolite 104 series plug and list the SP-413 nickel plug as the alternate service plug, and side-by-side visual comparison shows that the SP-500 has a slightly longer threaded portion than the SP-432, but not significantly so.
Thinking it was a goof in the Advance catalog (which happens periodically to supplier changes brought about by the CARQUEST buyout), I checked AutoZone, Rock Auto, and the Ford parts site. All of them list the SP-500.
I've heard of Ford superseding part numbers before, but in this age of increasingly strict emission standards, I have a hard time believing that they'd step down to a less efficient plug. I bought the truck used in 2010 with about 40k miles on it, so it wouldn't be illogical to assume that the plugs that I pulled out of it are the factory-equipped plugs. Then again, I know a guy with an '85 Grand Marquis with a 302 who feels compelled to replace plugs and wires on it every 5,000 miles.
Is it uncommon for Vulcan Rangers to be equipped with double platinum plugs?
Part numbers:
Motorcraft double platinum: AGSF32FM/SP-432
Motorcraft finewire platinum: AGSF22FM/SP-500