you need some 64s man..
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
So far I dont have driveline binding or axle hop, just the suspension bind. And it seems to flex good imho, I just don't like seeing the arms bend. Maybe my next axle (assuming no cast wedges) I will just have to bite the bullet and do 3 link :-\
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
My driveline hit the tank skid too so I put a bII tank in the rear,fit like a glove and was easy to plumb in.plus it moves a little weight to the back where youhave none
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
you need some 64s man..
What wall thickness is the tubing on the arms?
I wouldn't be worried about them if they are anything above 1/4" wall. They could bend a lot more before they plastically yield. Plus if the were perfectly rigid you'd be missing out on that flex![]()
is that fordyce? i wish i could have went.
Welding up the housing is a good idea. Pre and post heat with 3/16 7018 rod did my housing nicely
I don't understand all the fuss over 64s. I have AMPLE amounts of flex with my custom explorer/ranger leaves. IMHO, 64s kill your departure angle.
I don't understand all the fuss over 64s. I have AMPLE amounts of flex with my custom explorer/ranger leaves. IMHO, 64s kill your departure angle.
I agree, my 89 had the Chevy leaves and my 93 still has stock rangers and flex better than the 89 ever did.
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using Tapatalk