fordmike1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 19, 2009
- Messages
- 416
- Vehicle Year
- 1994 & 1983
- Transmission
- Automatic
Just curious, what gave you the idea Clevelands don't run ? Are you confusing them with the 351M ?![]()
No confusion. I do know that Clevelands can make some great power and I know that they had their day in the sun back when the Charleston was the popular dance.

The thing is there is so many better choises these days that we dont need to dig up old dinosaurs and try to make them live in this modern day world

I had a few Clevelands back in the day that made some serious power at a big cost. We built a Maverick with a 302 in it back about 17 years ago and it ran in the 10's with half the money and we drove it on the street almost everyday. Some thing that my Cleveland could never touch (cheap to build and streetable everyday). There are some hard core Cleveland and FE guys out there that will never get it as they are stuck in the past with these old dinosaurs. Remember that the Boss 302 came out with them canted valve heads before a cleveland did and technolgy has far surpast that design heads for the 302 & 351w's. Today you can build a stroker 302 into a 347 with Ford aluminum casting heads, be very streetable and make more power and torque then a 351c could ever with the same money dumped into it. If you are building a old 69/70 Mustang and you said that you wanted a Cleveland then go for it but in a Ranger where things are ALOT TIGHTER a 302/351w is a better choise. Hell a GM LS is a way better choise for a Ranger and like I said before I hate everything GM
