It's a 4WD minivan. It's where vehicular evolution is headed for the time being. Deal with it. Don't like it? Don't buy it.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
![]()
^this...this is what needs to be built next! Keep the soccer mom SUV's but build this for US..
It's not too far fetched. Look at what they did with the Raptor..I don't think they've forgotten about what we all would like to see.
oh and don't forget to build a small, barebones Ranger too! Please.
Why don't you post a pic of the actual Explorer instead of the concept?
![]()
![]()
I think it's a good looking vehicle. Yeah, off-road caability sucks, but WHO CARES?
These comments on the article sum up my feelings pretty well:
I'm glad Ford used the Explorer name instead of naming it something else. Remember what happened when they renamed the Taurus the Five Hundred? Nobody knew what the hell a Five Hundred was or that it even existed, hence, nobody bought one. But everyone knows what a Taurus is. And everyone has heard of the Explorer. Kudos to Ford for not making the same mistake twice.
I'm with exbass on this one...How many 2000+ Explorers have you seen that are suspension lifted, body lifted, or have larger than stock All-terrain or mud tires? Slim to none. Ford's not run by a bunch of idiots.
![]()
^this...this is what needs to be built next! Keep the soccer mom SUV's but build this for US..
It's not too far fetched. Look at what they did with the Raptor..I don't think they've forgotten about what we all would like to see.
oh and don't forget to build a small, barebones Ranger too! Please.
![]()
^this...this is what needs to be built next! Keep the soccer mom SUV's but build this for US..
It's not too far fetched. Look at what they did with the Raptor..I don't think they've forgotten about what we all would like to see.
oh and don't forget to build a small, barebones Ranger too! Please.
uhhhhhh... yall forget that the explorer hasn't been on the ranger platform for some years now right?
I mean... in 02 it lost every aspect of the ranger correct?
So.... I guess my question is... is there some good reason why your bitching now?
Or am I wrong?
Still has the same 4.0 engine and 5 speed automatic transmixer. Also has a 31 spline 8.8 rear axle (with a cool cast aluminum cover) and I believe it still has a D35 front diff too.
Otherwise... yeah, not much in common with a Ranger.
They would lose money on that Bronco... which is why they didn't pursue it.