Brain75
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2024
- Messages
- 2,011
- City
- ~Sterling
- State - Country
- CO - USA
- Vehicle Year
- 1990
- Vehicle
- Ford Ranger
- Engine
- 2.9 V6
- Transmission
- Manual
- Tire Size
- 215/70R14
For the most part there's only a couple things you can do, but that thankfully covers almost all the ways they go wrong.
Here's a video of a guy doing a quick touch up of an MG fuel sender (only video I could find) so it looks totally different, but principles apply. extra fine sanding off the contact windings, bending the arm a little so it engages better, reassemble and test - possibly have to solder from contact pin to winding which is tricky cause solder doesn't stick to the wire.
Don't know if you noticed, but I've got a '48 soooo way more than used to finding "the closest match" and then making it work / robbing parts from something still on the shelf and R&R-ing what I have with those parts.
Being remote in the land of snow I can completely understand... Not that this would be my first thought (cause cleaning the contacts, bending the armature slightly for better contact would be my first), but you could also buy the cheapest one oreilly sells in stock that is modern Ford (old pre 60-something ford was 160-16, now ford is 16-160) and scabbing the rheostat off it and rebuilding the one you got by replacing the rheostat would also be fairly useful as a 2nd choice.
I took the liberty of looking up Eagle River AK, and saw the oreally, and looked up "ford sending unit" no vehicle filter...
For $99 it looks like you can get one for 1997-2000 vehicles so would fit the classification of "modern", it lists as bi-fuel so don't know if they mean what as far as fuels go there.
Again, this maybe (most likely) not the best candidate to steal the rheostat off of, but you are only going to be able to tell that by going to one of the brick and mortar stores and comparing em side by side enough to decide if scabbing parts of it is useful.
Direct answer to direct question, yes wire rated "oil and gas resistant" - which covers just about any wire that is not cheap chinese.
Worst part of that is you also need oil and gas resistant shrink tube if you are rebuilding it totally correctly.
I would bet you won't get 30 years out of it if you use the wrong, but pretty likely to get 10 even with unrated wire/heat shrink. (the wire will get hard as a rock and when you touch it the jacket will fracture). If you don't have an OEM, but some PO has replaced it already you could very well have cheap wire in it right now.
If you do decide to get a donor sending unit and rebuilding with parts, take your ohm meter to the store and verify A) it is working (half of em are crap brand new) B) it is the right range... I keep saying 16-160 but some of the users here have shown EVTM pix that show oddball 22-154 or something, close but not the same.
Here's a video of a guy doing a quick touch up of an MG fuel sender (only video I could find) so it looks totally different, but principles apply. extra fine sanding off the contact windings, bending the arm a little so it engages better, reassemble and test - possibly have to solder from contact pin to winding which is tricky cause solder doesn't stick to the wire.
Don't know if you noticed, but I've got a '48 soooo way more than used to finding "the closest match" and then making it work / robbing parts from something still on the shelf and R&R-ing what I have with those parts.
Being remote in the land of snow I can completely understand... Not that this would be my first thought (cause cleaning the contacts, bending the armature slightly for better contact would be my first), but you could also buy the cheapest one oreilly sells in stock that is modern Ford (old pre 60-something ford was 160-16, now ford is 16-160) and scabbing the rheostat off it and rebuilding the one you got by replacing the rheostat would also be fairly useful as a 2nd choice.
I took the liberty of looking up Eagle River AK, and saw the oreally, and looked up "ford sending unit" no vehicle filter...
For $99 it looks like you can get one for 1997-2000 vehicles so would fit the classification of "modern", it lists as bi-fuel so don't know if they mean what as far as fuels go there.
Again, this maybe (most likely) not the best candidate to steal the rheostat off of, but you are only going to be able to tell that by going to one of the brick and mortar stores and comparing em side by side enough to decide if scabbing parts of it is useful.
Direct answer to direct question, yes wire rated "oil and gas resistant" - which covers just about any wire that is not cheap chinese.
Worst part of that is you also need oil and gas resistant shrink tube if you are rebuilding it totally correctly.
I would bet you won't get 30 years out of it if you use the wrong, but pretty likely to get 10 even with unrated wire/heat shrink. (the wire will get hard as a rock and when you touch it the jacket will fracture). If you don't have an OEM, but some PO has replaced it already you could very well have cheap wire in it right now.
If you do decide to get a donor sending unit and rebuilding with parts, take your ohm meter to the store and verify A) it is working (half of em are crap brand new) B) it is the right range... I keep saying 16-160 but some of the users here have shown EVTM pix that show oddball 22-154 or something, close but not the same.