Dana 44 Spindle & Hub Conversion On Dana 35 TTB

Overview

This step-by-step guide covers 1988–1996 Ford Ranger Dana 35 TTB front axle conversions using Dana 44 F-150/Bronco spindles and hubs. Learn which spindles, brake rotors, and stub shafts to use, how to maintain proper wheel bearing spacing, and tips for wheel bolt patterns and hub installation. Ideal for off-roaders, overlanders, and anyone upgrading their Dana 35 TTB strength without a full solid axle swap (SAS).

Introduction

There are two ways to install Dana 44 spindles and hubs on a Ford Ranger Dana 35 TTB:

This guide focuses on adding Dana 44 spindles to stock Dana 35 steering knuckles.

Reasons for the conversion:

  • Better wheel bearing spacing
  • Slightly larger stub shaft
  • Stronger locking hub

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use any Dana 44 spindle on a Dana 35 TTB?

Use 1991-1996 Ford F-150 / Bronco Dana 44 spindles with ABS for proper fitment. Spindles from other years may require modifications.

Do I need new brake rotors when swapping Dana 44 hubs?

Yes, machine the Dana 44 rotor to match the Dana 35 rotor diameter to ensure proper caliper clearance.

What Spindle Do I Use

The 1991–1996 Ford F-150 / Bronco Dana 44 with ABS (Antilock Brakes) use a 5-hole spindle that bolts onto the Dana 35 steering knuckle. The 1991–1994 spindle uses a one-piece hub seal, and the 1995–1996 spindle uses a two-piece hub seal.

The Dana 44 spindle (left) has wider wheel bearing spacing than the Dana 35 (right), increasing strength and offsetting stress from larger tires and higher offset wheels.

Dana 44 vs Dana 35 TTB spindle

Dana 35 TTB spindle vs Dana 44 spindle

Dana 44 spindle and hub swap installation

Which Brake Rotor Do I Use

The 1991-1993 and 1994-1996 F-150 / Bronco used different brake rotors, so just make sure that the rotor is for the same year spindle that you use.

The brake rotor is where the problem lies when using the Dana 44 parts. Here are the specifications for the Dana 44 brake rotor, and the Dana 35 brake rotor:

Dana 44 Rotor:

  • Outside Diameter: 11.713″
  • Nominal Thickness: 1.024″
  • Discard Thickness: 0.961

Dana 35 Brake Rotor:

  • Outside Diameter: 11.264″
  • Nominal Thickness: 1.024″
  • Discard Thickness: 0.965″

As you can see, the Dana 44 rotor is 0.449″ larger in diameter than the Dana 35 brake rotor. Because of this, the Dana 35 brake caliper won’t fit over the rotor. The solution is to have the outside diameter of the new brake rotor machined down to match the diameter of the Dana 35 rotor.

Which Stub Shaft (Outer Shaft) Do I Use

Use the 1988–1996 Ford F-150 / Bronco Dana 44 outer stub shaft. Dana 35 and Dana 44 use the same U-joint, making replacement straightforward.

The Dana 44 stub shaft is 1.21″ and slightly larger than the Dana 35 1.06″ shaft.

Dana 44 TTB outer stub shaft

Dana 44 spindle and hub conversion

Wheel Bolt Pattern

After the conversion, the front axle will have a 5×5.5 bolt pattern (Ranger stock is 5×4.5). Use wheel adapters to match the front and rear wheel bolt patterns.

Wheel bolt pattern after Dana 44 conversion

Diagrams

Dana 44 TTB exploded view diagram

Dana 35 TTB axle exploded view diagram

Related Articles

Dana 44 Knuckle Swap On To Dana 35

Beefing Up The Ford Ranger Dana 35 TTB

The Mappyjack Dana 44 Spindle & Hub Conversion

Should You Replace A Dana 35 TTB With A Dana 44?

Ford Ranger Dana 44 TTB Conversion FAQs

Dana 44 TTB Axle Swap

Last Updated:

About The Author

Founder / Administrator at  | Staff Profile

Jim Oaks is the founder of The Ranger Station, one of the longest-running Ford Ranger enthusiast communities on the web. He has spent over three decades owning, modifying, repairing, and driving Ford Rangers on the street, trail, and cross-country routes.

Since launching TheRangerStation.com in 1999, Jim has documented thousands of real-world Ranger builds, technical repairs, drivetrain swaps, suspension modifications, and off-road tests contributed by owners worldwide. His work has been referenced by enthusiasts, mechanics, and off-road builders looking for practical, experience-based information rather than theoretical advice.

Jim’s hands-on experience includes long-distance overland travel, trail use, drivetrain and axle upgrades, suspension tuning, and platform comparisons across multiple Ranger generations. The content published on The Ranger Station is grounded in first-hand experience and community-verified data, not marketing claims or generic specifications.