• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

What is the weirdest engine you've seen in a ranger?


Zapper

Yes i can afford this without "daddies money"
Joined
Mar 12, 2019
Messages
140
Age
21
City
Buhl,ID
Vehicle Year
1986ish
Engine
2.9 V6
Transmission
Manual
Total Drop
shot bushings?
Tire Size
235/75/r15
My credo
To send it or not to send it, that is the question.
What is the weirdest engine you have ever seen swapped in a ranger, or what would be a weird engine swap for a ranger?

i'm totally not looking for ideas... heh
 
Put in a 6.5hp predator drom harbor freight. More power then a 3.0 and cheaper then a lima.
 
Here ya go...rubber band motor.
:yahoo:
Or, foot power.
:icon_rofl:
Or wind power.
;missingteeth;
Grumpaw
 

Attachments

  • 0546313A-20D6-4909-9B9B6FE1D042092D_source.jpg
    0546313A-20D6-4909-9B9B6FE1D042092D_source.jpg
    36.5 KB · Views: 204
  • fred-flintstone.png
    fred-flintstone.png
    356.1 KB · Views: 206
  • wind-powered-car.jpg
    wind-powered-car.jpg
    69.4 KB · Views: 202
Last edited:
4.0 SOHC is already a weird engine. Why would I need to put something different in it? :haha:
 
Put a Harley engine in it.
 
Funny how you make fun of the 3.0 but not only did it replace the poor 2.9 but it has more hp and torque, on paper and on the road. There's a reason why they stopped making the 2.9's obviously and that's why they used the 3.0 for how many years now? Oh from 1991-2008.. The 2.9 1986-1992... 17 years for the 3.0 and only 6 years for the 2.9. I can keep going if you want. There's plenty more stats comparing the two.
 
Hmmmm those are the same reasons they stopped selling the 3.0 after the 2.3 duratec came out. :icon_rofl:
 
Funny how you make fun of the 3.0 but not only did it replace the poor 2.9 but it has more hp and torque, on paper and on the road. There's a reason why they stopped making the 2.9's obviously and that's why they used the 3.0 for how many years now? Oh from 1991-2008.. The 2.9 1986-1992... 17 years for the 3.0 and only 6 years for the 2.9. I can keep going if you want. There's plenty more stats comparing the two.
2.9 had it beat in torque in the early years, 165 vs 170 and the 2.9 peaked 1000RPM lower. Not to mention the 2.9 had plenty of untapped potential.

The 2.9 was phased out due to the fact it was only used in the ranger by the time 92 came along and the 3.0 was used in alot of stuff. Prove otherwise.

Didnt you use to drive a ford escort?
Escorts are way cooler then fiestas.
 
You said it yourself, "the 3.0 was used in a lot of stuff" where as the 2.9 was only used in the ranger.... Seems like they were scared to use it in anything else. Untapped potential doesn't matter, you can put a turbo on anything if you really wanted to. Once I get my truck fixed I will be ready to spank any 2.9 out there (if there is one running around here) haha.
 
Ok then...

maxresdefault.jpg
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top