EMB1230
Well-Known Member
FWD vs RWD 3.0 & 3.8. I know for one that the 3.0 intake is rotated 180 degrees and that they used different head gaskets and cooling systems are slightly different.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
Actually, that is just a myth. the Ford 3.8 was a copy of the GM Buick 3.8The 3.8 as found in the Mustang? It's basically the 5.0L missing two cylinders from what I remember.
Dave
FWD vs RWD 3.0 & 3.8. I know for one that the 3.0 intake is rotated 180 degrees and that they used different head gaskets and cooling systems are slightly different.
The 3.8 as found in the Mustang? It's basically the 5.0L missing two cylinders from what I remember.
Dave
The Countour was a 2.5 Duratec. The Vulcan in FWD applications was used, in the Taurus, Tempo, Probe and Windstar. in RWD apps, Aerostar and Ranger. But that's what's funny, the 3.8's intake retained the same orientation it had in RWD cars that it did in FWD cars.The 3.8 is a copy of the Buick 3.8 but just not as good. It was the first Ford engine with an external oil pump. It's called Essex.
The 3.0 Duratec is actually a much better engine. There is no relationship between the two.
I'm not sure if the Ranger 3.0 is similar to the 3.0 engines in the Taurus or Contour or any other FWD car it was used in. In general sideways engines cannot be installed in RWD vehicles mainly due to the intake and exhaust set ups.
The Countour was a 2.5 Duratec. The Vulcan in FWD applications was used, in the Taurus, Tempo, Probe and Windstar. in RWD apps, Aerostar and Ranger. But that's what's funny, the 3.8's intake retained the same orientation it had in RWD cars that it did in FWD cars.
The bellhousing pattern of the RWD is not the same as the 5.0/5.8 (& 4.9)