red2003xlt
Active Member
Davis Unified Ignition D.U.I. has a Screamin Demons Ignition Coil and Wires.
New to me
http://performancedistributors.com/product/1602/.
New to me
http://performancedistributors.com/product/1602/.
Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
Back then the fan/clutch combo was probably cheaper overall. No wires, relays, larger alt. ect ect,...... Price drives many decisionsA 14% improvement in mileage from an electric fan seems unrealistic. No manufacturer would pass that up, and it's not like Ford didn't know about electric fans. Keep track of it long term and see what you get.
The cheapest cars they make have electric fans. It's not an expensive technology and has been worked out for over 40 years, so I don't really buy that they went with a mechanical fan and clutch to save money. Additionally, automakers go to great lengths to improve mileage ratings, so if they could get that kind of improvement just by using off-the-shelf parts they install on the vast majority of cars these days anyway, I have no doubt they would have. This is why I'm skeptical that the switch to an electric fan will produce that kind of improvement - if it did they would not still be using mechanically driven clutch fans.Back then the fan/clutch combo was probably cheaper overall. No wires, relays, larger alt. ect ect,...... Price drives many decisions
Keep you fan in place then.The cheapest cars they make have electric fans. It's not an expensive technology and has been worked out for over 40 years, so I don't really buy that they went with a mechanical fan and clutch to save money. Additionally, automakers go to great lengths to improve mileage ratings, so if they could get that kind of improvement just by using off-the-shelf parts they install on the vast majority of cars these days anyway, I have no doubt they would have. This is why I'm skeptical that the switch to an electric fan will produce that kind of improvement - if it did they would not still be using mechanically driven clutch fans.
It would v be nice to have a page or links to the torque specs for various years and models that could be easily accessed, if that doesn't already exist. It might reduce the amount of redundant questions people ask and save time sifting through random forum posts trying to find them. That's my 2 cents, but I'm charging a dollar.I want to update the 3.0 Page in the Technical Library in the coming month(s).
The page is a few years old and I'm not sure how accurate the info is anymore. If you have ANY suggestions as to what should be added, changed or deleted from the page, please post them here. This includes part numbers, names of manufacturers, links, custom modifications, know problems or even cheap tricks.
Thanks.
This sounds like a very good idea to me and would be a useful addition to the tech library. Most of the manuals focus on fluid intervals and such and those of us with less experience with the Fords (like myself) would benefit greatly."Service Life Extension" suggestions thread for the 3.0 (as well as the other engines)
I was going to make up my own list of things to do to my engine to ensure that I have a reliable and dependable truck for the next few years since buying a new truck is not in my future anytime soon (assuming a rebuild is not needed). In the military, aircraft (and other machines) would be overhauled & updated under a SLEP (Service Life Extension Program), allowing to a longer useful lifespan.
My Ranger is turning 125K miles, so I want to:
Replace the chirping camshaft synchroniser & sensor
Replace the serpentine belt
Inspect & replace any rubber hoses under the hood if needed
Inspect & replace cooling system components (water pump, thermostat, coolant, hoses) if needed
Replace plugs & wires
Replace filters (including fuel and auto trans)
Replace trans fluid (power steering too) if needed
This would be like a milestone maintenance list for high mileage engines, if you will.