Oh boy. Like it or not that 22R was major power potential. I would just get a nice older Toyota truck though since the rest of the driveline and the suspension also share the same reliability. I had one I bought for 300 bucks with 225k on it it. I beat that thing silly as a trail and field truck for years. I sold it for 500 and it is still being driven as a winter truck by my friend Bob. 275k on it now.
but a ranger with a 2.3 is equally reliable, underpowered, and also has major power potential (EG. over 300WHP on the stock reciprocating assembly)....and that engines already in the truck.
the 22r is a good motor, it just doesnt offer anything that the ranger doesnt already have.
i guess if you wanted it for pure uniqueness, then go for it. but theres no other way to justify this swap.
It's a good engine, but there are plenty of options that are easier/cheaper to adapt that offer similar reliability. It's not like the stock 2.3, 3.0, and 4.0 engines were particularly unreliable either.
Prettymuch. A friend of mine has an 87 4Runner with 4.56s and 31s and he whines all day long about how the RV cam wasn't enough, and how he needs a header, and bla bla bla.....
Another friend has a 95 Yota single cab with stock 4.10s and 31s and the motor he has came from a Yota freak who claimed 250 hp when he had it a carbed set up on it with 48mm venturis. He put his EFI stuff on it, and he runs around all day at like 4k RPM like a tard since it can spin way past the fuel cut off point. I can still beat him up hills with my heavy Supercab with a weak 2.9, 3.73s and 31s.
For
a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting
Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here.
Click the banner to find out how.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.