• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

might wanna take a look at this one...


Ya I wouldn't worry about it. I don't even get what the benefit would be for the people who want this to pass.
 
In the little bit of research I've done, I see this as more censorship in the name of protecting copyright material. BUT it also gives the government AND big business the right to shut down any site that has copyrighted material and or LINKS to such material. This is a very dangerous law as written and I think should be voted against. If Canada tries to bring such a law into being I will fight against it in any way that I can.

Richard
 
congress needs to work about 3 weeks a year.


and shitcan about 80 percent of the laws already hindering freedom.
 
As much as I want to. I'm afraid to sign stuff like that or even click on the link for that matter although I did already. I kinda think it's a open invitation for who ever runs that site to use and tap into your personal info.
 
"The thing about quotes on the internet is you can not confirm their validity." - Abraham Lincoln




:icon_rofl:








You voted for Obama to prove your not racist. Now vote for Cain to prove your not stupid. - Bumper Sticker




:icon_thumby::icon_thumby:
 
You voted for Obama to prove your not racist. Now vote for Cain to prove your not stupid

:icon_thumby::icon_thumby:

I like it!
 
Ya I wouldn't worry about it. I don't even get what the benefit would be for the people who want this to pass.

Control. I honestly believe that a vast majority of what has been done by the Obama misadministration has been done in the name of gaining more control and power for the Federal government.

In fact I heard a quote from a DC area Judge on the radio Weds night. He said that anything that comes out of Congress must be constitutional just because Congress passed it.

I'll go see if I can find the actual quote.


EDIT: Found it,

Judge Silberman, who approvingly cited Sutton, added that courts must "presume that acts of Congress are constitutional." He joined by Judge Harry Edwards, an appointee of Jimmy Carter. Judge Brett Kavanaugh, named by George W. Bush, dissented.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washin...alth-care-law-Obama-justices-court/51128740/1
 
Last edited:
Control. I honestly believe that a vast majority of what has been done by the Obama misadministration has been done in the name of gaining more control and power for the Federal government.

In fact I heard a quote from a DC area Judge on the radio Weds night. He said that anything that comes out of Congress must be constitutional just because Congress passed it.

I'll go see if I can find the actual quote.


EDIT: Found it,



http://www.usatoday.com/news/washin...alth-care-law-Obama-justices-court/51128740/1

That's stupid. All congress is is a bunch of grumpy old guys that doesn't know what Facebook or YouTube is and they wanna ruin the fun for everyone else.
 
Judge Silberman, who approvingly cited Sutton, added that courts must "presume that acts of Congress are constitutional." He joined by Judge Harry Edwards, an appointee of Jimmy Carter. Judge Brett Kavanaugh, named by George W. Bush, dissented.

Democrat appointees. Color me not surprised by their ignorance of constitutional law.
 
holy fawking fawk.....

that judge should be a janitor somewhere...:shok:
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top