Galaxie427
Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2007
- Messages
- 5
- Transmission
- Automatic
Hi all,
I've read nearly every thread I can find on the wonderful Ranger hyd clutch setup. Here's some backstory:
Drove my "new" (to me) 93 Ranger on a 640 mile round trip. 2.3, 2wd, 5 speed. About 4 hours into the trip, the clutch feels funny and I can't bang in or out of gear without a lot of drama. I begin to match speeds and forget about the clutch, and start it in gear. Let it sit overnight at the thotel, and it worked fine the next morning. For about an hour..........and the pedal was bad. Now, mind you, I could disengage the engine about halfway, meaning I could step on the clutch and still hold the truck with the brake. Yeah, not real nice to the already worn out clutch and trans, but hey, I was 320 miles from home.
SO. I read all the horror stories about Ranger clutches, bleeding hyd systems, etc. I went out and bought a new master cyl, seeing how that's a lot easier than having to drop the trans. Well, I think the slave is bad, since the pedal still sucks. Or does it? I'm fairly sure it's not bled right.
ANYWAY.......my question is, how does one know which is bad, the master or the slave? No leaks anywhere, plenty of dirty juice in the resevior. BTW, the dirty juice make me feel good about hte master replacement; I figured the seals were bad, causing the blackened brake fluid. But after my feeble bleeding attempts under th truck, I see lots of the same nasty juice coing out of the bleeder. Damn.
So, what do you think? If anyone wants a 93 Ranger in exchange for a running anything, let me know! So far, I hate this truck.
Thanks,
Pete
I've read nearly every thread I can find on the wonderful Ranger hyd clutch setup. Here's some backstory:
Drove my "new" (to me) 93 Ranger on a 640 mile round trip. 2.3, 2wd, 5 speed. About 4 hours into the trip, the clutch feels funny and I can't bang in or out of gear without a lot of drama. I begin to match speeds and forget about the clutch, and start it in gear. Let it sit overnight at the thotel, and it worked fine the next morning. For about an hour..........and the pedal was bad. Now, mind you, I could disengage the engine about halfway, meaning I could step on the clutch and still hold the truck with the brake. Yeah, not real nice to the already worn out clutch and trans, but hey, I was 320 miles from home.
SO. I read all the horror stories about Ranger clutches, bleeding hyd systems, etc. I went out and bought a new master cyl, seeing how that's a lot easier than having to drop the trans. Well, I think the slave is bad, since the pedal still sucks. Or does it? I'm fairly sure it's not bled right.
ANYWAY.......my question is, how does one know which is bad, the master or the slave? No leaks anywhere, plenty of dirty juice in the resevior. BTW, the dirty juice make me feel good about hte master replacement; I figured the seals were bad, causing the blackened brake fluid. But after my feeble bleeding attempts under th truck, I see lots of the same nasty juice coing out of the bleeder. Damn.
So, what do you think? If anyone wants a 93 Ranger in exchange for a running anything, let me know! So far, I hate this truck.
Thanks,
Pete