You folks who keep sticking to your velocity through the MAF seem to forget one thing. Look at the entire intake, from the MAF to the throttle body. The MAS is 3.0 diameter, as is the throttle body. The tube is "pinched down" in between the two. The velocity of the airflow does not increase until it hits the "pinched down" segment, which is well after it passes through the MAS.
Therefore the airflow the MAS sees is the same, no matter what diameter the tube is in between. All a 3.0 in tube does is keep the diameter the same for the full length, instead of "pinching" it down in between. As far as the airflow into the throttle body, once it leaves the "pinched down" segment and hits the three inch segment again, guess what? It slows down again.
I personally feel the only reason the"pinched down" segment exists at all is for fit. To gain some clearance for the alternator pulley, as the three inch pipe gets pretty close. You have to make some pretty fine adjustments to keep the alternator pulley from hitting the tube.
Also a "pinched down" tube reduces the amount of noise transferred through to the filter. A three inch pipe with a cone filter on the end does sound pretty cool. A lot of things on vehicles are designed by "Group Think". And that usually leaves a lot to be desired.
I have run my vehicle with a three inch tube, and replaced the stocker a few times. Every time I put the stocker on, I can feel the power loss. The stocker gives a bit more low end power, whereas a three inch tube lets it rev higher due to less resistance. Guess what? The 3.0 LIKES TO REV. And a three inch tube lets it do just that, way better than the stock POS intake.
If I did not need mine for the occassional trouble-shooting, I would have tossed it in the BIG round open top container long ago. And basically it has not really even helped on trouble-shooting.
Anyone want to buy a 1998 3.0 stock intake? Because it is junk!
