• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

How do you like your 5g?


Who dragged an '85 into this?

This greatly complicates me arguing against Rusty....

But at the end of the day... the OP doesn't care. He is in the same boat I am, a standard cab truck ain't enough truck... so who cares.
 
Ok then.. "The new Ford Ranger is better than a rusty old 85 or 87 Ranger. Two fer Tuesday
Only *slightly* better and not the be all end all yall are making it out to be and its lacking in other important areas compared to the old one.

Once again i was comparing it originally to a 77 F150.
 
Oh and mines an 87. Either way, we are done here.

Only *slightly* better and not the be all end all yall are making it out to be and its lacking in other important areas compared to the old one.

Once again i was comparing it originally to a 77 F150.

You keep making these promises... are you a politician or something?
 
Why does not having a manual transmission keep getting dragged into this. Ford never put a worthwhile manual in a Ranger to start with.
 
Why does not having a manual transmission keep getting dragged into this. Ford never put a worthwhile manual in a Ranger to start with.

Ego...
 
Being curious, I tried to dig up what I could find about my dad's old 76 truck.

Horsepower - 145!!! My 97 B4000 is rated for 160. Emissions really crippled the big v8s in the mid 70s.
Can't find torque for the 360, it may well be higher than the 220-225 or so for the 4.0 OHV. One would hope so, anyway!!!!!

But the 3 speed auto without a torque converter lockup, surely sucked up some of that torque.

GVWR (from the Ford brochure) was a little over 6,000 lbs. for the '76 F150. My B4000 is close to that, will dig up the owner's manual tomorrow, or look on the door tag. But it appears that the 76 pickup itself soaks up nearly two tons of that. My B4000, empty with an extended cab, I think is in the low 3,000 lb. range empty, and so the net payload is within a whisker for each.

No mileage figures given.... but as 'thirsty' as my B4000 is, guaranteed it has close to double the mileage. At least it appears that Ford had gotten rid of breaker points by then.

Other than being able to lay a sheet of plywood in the bed and close the tailgate, I think my B4000 ended up a much better vehicle. It certainly has the edge in longevity - still doesn't consume oil past a quarter million miles, and only one (very recent) transmission rebuild.

Likely the rear axle on dad's truck was a 9 inch. The 8.8 is certainly comparable, and from stories he's told me, the 8.8 has MUCH better wheel bearings. I know for a fact my 68 Bronco had ball bearings. Tapered roller bearings just last a LOT longer.

Never mind the 2020 Ranger..... I really think my 97 was / is a better vehicle than the mid 70s single cab F150s, nostalgia aside.
 
Likely the rear axle on dad's truck was a 9 inch. The 8.8 is certainly comparable, and from stories he's told me, the 8.8 has MUCH better wheel bearings. I know for a fact my 68 Bronco had ball bearings. Tapered roller bearings just last a LOT longer.

The best 9" is comparable to the best 8.8" for strength and durability. However the aftermarket for the 9" is totally nuts... you can easily build a 9" without a single Ford part in it.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top