High mileage question.

[BagoXCAlum99]

Hey all,
Found a 95 Ranger STX 4x4 4.0 near me that I'm interested in. Only issue is the mileage (170,XXX). Should I let this scare me away? Any issues to look for? From the pics, it appears to be in pretty good shape. Not sure if I should pull the trigger, mostly due to the mileage. Obviously I'd have to drive it know what kind of overall shape its in. What do you guys think?

Matt

 

[bmerr98]

171,000 = high miles? Pshaw! That's just a little past the break in period. My 1998 has over 232,000 and runs like a top. I'd head out cross country without a second thought. Give it a good look over and roll forth!

 

[BLOODBANE]

My 94 Explorer has 228,000 with the original a4ld transmission in it. True it has lost some power over the years and could use a rebuild, but it still starts everytime...

 

[American1990]

I pulled a 4.0 from a 1992 Ford ranger for my swap from a 2.9. When i asked he said the 4.0 had either 300,000 or 200,000, and it been almost a year since the swap with anywhere from 20-35,00 miles and I am NOT easy on this engine. This engine sees 5k shifts, red-lines, clutch drops, red light drag races, and SERIOUS off road abuse. And she cranks up every time first crank. I would have complete trust in this engine to get me anywhere I need to go. As long as you change the oil and do the minor maintenance this engine is about bullet proof as you can get.

 

[ab_slack]

2002 Explorer with 180K miles on it.

Someone once mentioned to me that they rather get an old car with high miles on it than low. The high miles probably means it has been driven. Driving is better than sitting where things tend to rot.

170K miles since 1995 isn't that many per year actually.

More than anything it comes down to how well maintained and how much rust there is.

 

[RonD]

4.0l OHV is a good engine, 170k wouldn't be scary, but I wouldn't tell the seller that, lol.

Take a look at the rear spring hangers they get rusted out.

My '94 4.0l 4x4 is over 300k now, drive train and bottom end are still original, new clutches and brakes over the years and did have a cracked head after a water pump leak, my fault though.
Oh and new rear spring hangers

 

[Road Angels]

Depends on the price, mileage goes up, price comes down check every thing, every button, tire wear thats uneven, like RonD says rust, flulids, you would be surprised how many times I have looked at a car and the seller wasnt smart enough, to change or even add the quart of oil that was need, walk away on these, if its an automatic, pull the dip stick and look at it, if not a clean bright red color then it hasnt been serviced, also smell the fluid it should not smell burnt, check for a tow set up, and a trailer or boat on the property, used to tow alot??? I my self never buy any thing with more than 80K but you pay alot more, but down the road it pays off, 300k on my 86 2.3 but she rattles

 

[jhammel85]

I think you'll be fine. Drive it and if it feels fine and runs fine, then it is.

4.0's are great.

 

[1994Ranger$$$pit]

My '94 4.0l 4x4 has 160,000 on it and so far so good.
I would definitely get under the truck and check it for frame rot.
The rear shackles and the shock mounts.

 

[wildbill23c]

Look it over really good, if its the automatic transmission test drive it for an extended period of time, get it heated up, see if it starts slipping, dropping out of overdrive, etc. Check all the fluids, if the transmission fluid smells and looks burned don't walk, run away. Those transmissions aren't exactly the greatest and the slightest amount of neglect can mean a $3k+ transmission replacement. Also, don't rely on anything that the seller claims and says either, they're trying to unload something they don't want. Oftentimes they'll have stuff doctored up just to get the vehicle sold then you'll drive away and have nothing but trouble within a few days or weeks. Do your test drive at highway speeds, starts, stops, run it hard, etc. Don't baby it, you want the vehicle to be able to be driven hard, if it can handle that then you should be good, if it gives you problems during the test drive I'd walk away. Well unless you want a project truck LOL.

 

[97RangerXLT]

Saw a 1997 ranger in the pull a part that was turned in for cash for clunkers that had 328, 000 on the clock when they killed it. Made me sad. It was even an identical twin of my ranger.

Sent from the Galaxy to the interwebs

 

[wildbill23c]

yep a lot of perfectly good vehicles were destroyed because of that stupid cash for clunkers BS. I bet that many of those new vehicles have already been destroyed or even repo'd once or twice already.

 

[JackDW]

Purchased an 03 w 4.0 auto about a 1 1/2 ago with approx 170,000 miles. Turned 200,000 this past weekend. Had a couple issues to begin with (which I knew about). Replaced alternator and radiator and one vaccum hose, also new plugs (olds ones looked good when I took them out). It has ran perfect ever since.

Front tires are started to wear on one side so I think I will just rebuild the front end when I get a changes. Hey, it has 200,000 miles so I can expect some thing to be worn out but it is manageable and not really expense if you can do the work yourself. Since Ford no longer makes the Ranger, what choice do I have but to fix it and keep going. I cannot replace it with a new one.

I would not be worried about 170,000 miles as long as it has had resonable service. Does not have to be perfect serviced, just resonable.

 

[BagoXCAlum99]

Thanks for the info guys! Here is a link to the truck itself. What do you think?
http://www.timsautooutlet.com/detai...D=634&referrer=Craigslist&autopostid=12212695
Matt

 

[American1990]

It in really good condition, and the 170k I would say just past the break in stage. if everything working right, transmission, power steering, 4x4, and ect.. i would jump on it. It a nice looking truck and from the pictures it looks well taken care of for a truck with 170,000.