- Joined
- May 10, 2010
- Messages
- 4,171
- Points
- 3,101
- City
- haida gwaii
- Vehicle Year
- 1991
- Transmission
- Manual
well, the aerodynamics are hard to judge...
a brief discussion on aerodynamics,and why it's not too hard to make some broad assumptions about the drag of a particular item.
there are three key items that determine the drag.the main one is frontal area,or how big a hole you need to punch through the air.
second is the aspect ratio,or how long the item is relative to it's frontal area.a quarter travelling face on into the wind will have more drag than a roll of quarters the same way,even though the frontal area is the same.
a dime,on the other hand will have less drag than the roll of quarters,because it has significantly less frontal area.
the third important factor(but the one that tends to get the most attention as it's the main one we have control over)is the shape.shape the ends to a point and curve the middle and drag will decrease further.
coefficient of drag is a term we often hear...this is simply the ratio of the drag presented by a flat surface of a given area divided by the actual drag of the item being tested with the same frontal area.so a smaller item with a high drag coefficient will have less overall drag than a larger item with a low coefficient.
having said that,the frontal area of a fullsize truck(my f350)is 5472sq''.
the frontal area of a ranger is 4096sq''.
the frontal on the gt is 2016sq''.....so we can see right off the bat it's not punching a very big hole through the air.
it's also pretty long for it's frontal size,and before i stuck the carbs through the hood,had a pretty slippery shape.the perfectly smooth bottom doesn't hurt either.
while i can't give solid numbers on it's overall drag,i can be pretty certain that the gt will be more aerodynamic than a ranger with more than twice the frontal area.
Last edited: