global warming: double BS!
skippy and mark88 have good input.
I'm surprised that MAKG has not responded yet, as I am certain it will be enlightening and accurate and scientific.
Speaking of "scientific," that is exactly what the UN-sponsored group of so-called scientists did NOT present with their "consensus."
"Science" and "consensus" are oxymorons.
Most of the "Global Warming Crisis" is based upon a computer model of the Earth's atmosphere; there exists a large number of variables in the model, and those variables are difficult to quantify. A computer model of the optimal drying time of automotive paint was created and, due to the number of variables that were difficult to quantify, the model failed to predict a useful answer for the painter--this a much smaller model with far fewer variables. Where am I going with this?...Conclusion: Do not believe the liberal/progressive/socialist/wealth-redistribution drivel that the old media reports, because it is based upon faulty evidence and therefore, faulty conclusions. More accurately: They did not let fact get in the way of their foreknown opinion.
Yes, the temperatures may be slightly warmer in some areas now, but in the Middle East, temperatures are dropping. SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE demonstrates that there are cycles of heating and cooling, and that these periods may span 200 years. SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE admits that the "hole in the ozone layer" can not be measured. SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE identifies that the single largest producer of CO2 (carbon dioxide) is animals.
Yes, we, especially the offroad community, should clean up after ourselves and others when on a trail, and we should not dump our used oil on the ground or into the sewer drain, and we should recycle our EverReady flashlight batteries, and our flourescent lamps should not be broken and put in the dumpster (due to mercury content)--that should be common sense; but we need not fall prey to the media hype of "Environmental Crisis" that is currently in vogue--the "Crisis" simply does not exist.