• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Gas mileage 460 vs 351m


Rico

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
180
Vehicle Year
1992
Transmission
Manual
I have a 1979 F-150 4x4 and I wanted to make up my mind on swapping in a 460 or keeping the good ole 351m in it. But my question is why do these two engines with about 109 cubic inches apart have the same gas mileage? This is really stumping me.:icon_confused: If any of you guys can help me confirm this I think I'm gonna go with a 460 in my truck especially since I plan on bigger tires and off-roading a lot with it.
 
More available power means that the engine has to do a lower % of its maximum work to do the same job. Less work means less fuel.

The 351M is kinda nerfed by emissions crap and a less than wonderful design. It has a long stroke and low compression (for emissions) which means it needs more fuel to give the same power. The 460 doesn't have that issue.
 
You want a 460 and your worring about fuel mileage???
:icon_rofl::icon_rofl::icon_rofl::icon_rofl:
Just shoehorn it in, this I gotta see in a Ranger!!!!
Im thinking..........BUILD THREAD!!
 
I'm thinking about the power advantage not the gas mileage crazy.:annoyed: If the gas milage is the same then why not go for the bigger motor?
 
460 and gas mileage shouldn't be in the same sentence... our F250 probably got 8mpg empty... 5 or 6mpg pulling a trailer... yeah, I don't care what you put it in, the 460 is a gas hog.
 
I had a 1978 F150 4X4 super cab with the granny 4 speed way back when. It had the 351 M and I could get 15 MPG on a very good day empty. That truck would pull down a house too.
 
I had a 1978 F150 4X4 super cab with the granny 4 speed way back when. It had the 351 M and I could get 15 MPG on a very good day empty. That truck would pull down a house too.

The 351M isn't a bad engine, but it doesn't hold a candle to the Cleveland, the Windsor, or the 460
 
460 with a after market timing chain and gears.
Parts are pretty cheap believe it or not,in the process of building one myself,still in the collecting parts and research phase.
 
460 definitely, it'll get the same gas mileage as a 351m, and make more power. Plus performance parts are a lot easier to find.
 
Same as the expeditions with the 5.4l and the 4.6l the 5.4 gets better mileage. Just like running too high of a gear, 5th when 3rd will do. Your dumping a bunch of extra fuel to get the work done, and its being wasted. but seriously your talking about a 351m (which is basically a small block 400) and a 460. Why the hell has gas mileage even crossed your mind? Think of shuttle launching into space when you think gas mileage.
 
460 with a after market timing chain and gears.
Parts are pretty cheap believe it or not,in the process of building one myself,still in the collecting parts and research phase.

Talk to 7.5_STX. He's managed to cram a 460 into his 91.
 
if i were you id keep the 351M. it will be just as good on gas or better, and unless your looking for a shit load of hp your wasting your time and effort. alot of people bash the 351m but i love mine and would not trade it for a 460 for the world

The 351M isn't a bad engine, but it doesn't hold a candle to the Cleveland, the Windsor, or the 460

your kidding right? my 351m will tear up a 351w like a freakin 2.9 lol
 
Talk to 7.5_STX. He's managed to cram a 460 into his 91.

i have a buddy who is currently cramming a built 429 in his 2nd gen, hes t120r on here but i dont think he posted yet
 
460 definitely, it'll get the same gas mileage as a 351m, and make more power. Plus performance parts are a lot easier to find.

Dunno about that, stroker kits are pretty common for a 351M... all you need is a crank and pistons out of a 400. That is a heck of an engine.

Same as the expeditions with the 5.4l and the 4.6l the 5.4 gets better mileage. Just like running too high of a gear, 5th when 3rd will do. Your dumping a bunch of extra fuel to get the work done, and its being wasted. but seriously your talking about a 351m (which is basically a small block 400) and a 460. Why the hell has gas mileage even crossed your mind? Think of shuttle launching into space when you think gas mileage.

Same with the 4.2, 4.6, and 5.4 in the F-150, they all get about the same :icon_confused:

Even a 302 in a fullsize doesn't get much better milage than a 460, mid teens vs low teens.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top